If you're in your twenties and you're not liberal,
you don't have a heart.
If you're in your forties and you're not conservative,
you don't have a brain.
If you're in your sixties and you can't decide,
you must be a US Senator.
Monday, December 21, 2009
American Middle-Class Goes to Prison
The Senate has just passed the great American health bill.
The Drama continues
Monthly premiums will be required.
If you do not pay your premiums
If you do not pay your children's premiums
You will go to jail.
Free housing!
Free food!
Free health care.
Hmmmm, .....
The Drama continues
Monthly premiums will be required.
If you do not pay your premiums
If you do not pay your children's premiums
You will go to jail.
Free housing!
Free food!
Free health care.
Hmmmm, .....
Welcome to the Psychotic Hotline
If you are obsessive-compulsive, press 1 repeatedly.
If you are codependant, please ask someone to press 2.
If you have multiple personalities, please press 3, 4, 5, and 6.
If you are paranoid-delusional, we know who you are and what you want. Just stay on the line while we trace your call.
If you are schizophrenic, listen carefully and a little voice will tell you which number to press.
If you are depressed, it doesn’t matter which number you press. No one will answer.
If you are anal-retentive, press 3,7,4 (simultaneously), then rapidly press 9,4,5,5,3,Z,5,1,#,6,4,*.*. Stand on you left foot and await a response.
If you are manic depressive imagine you've been put on hold and pretend to hang up the phone.
If you are codependant, please ask someone to press 2.
If you have multiple personalities, please press 3, 4, 5, and 6.
If you are paranoid-delusional, we know who you are and what you want. Just stay on the line while we trace your call.
If you are schizophrenic, listen carefully and a little voice will tell you which number to press.
If you are depressed, it doesn’t matter which number you press. No one will answer.
If you are anal-retentive, press 3,7,4 (simultaneously), then rapidly press 9,4,5,5,3,Z,5,1,#,6,4,*.*. Stand on you left foot and await a response.
If you are manic depressive imagine you've been put on hold and pretend to hang up the phone.
Monday, November 23, 2009
Friday, November 6, 2009
Life after death. Yes or No?
In the discussion of whether or not there is a God, is a question of more immediate concern to many of us: is there life after death?
Obviously there are a myriad of offered answers from "of course not" to "of course." Few people allow for a maybe.
In order to answer the question though, there seems to be a more fundemental question: Is life after death possible and if so is it scienifically defensable?
We have the obvious problem with belief in God: the existance of God is unprovable. As a being outside of time and space, he is by that nature, beyond the constructs of science. Ergo, we must have faith - or not.
On the otherhand, since we, human beings, are finite beings existing within the confines of time and space, if we continue to exist in any form, it should be observable and if so, provable.
A major presupposition in the belief in God, and major Holy Books of the great religions, is the belief in life after death. We go to a better world. Or in the case of the terrible twins, a not so better world (maybe).
So, how do we prove that life after death is possible? Do you believe in ghosts, spirits, ufos (oops, wrong argument)?
Is life after death possible? If so, how? Spirit? Energy? There are many views on this. Are we physical beings that generated a conscious energy at birth or are we energy beings that inhabited the physical body at birth. Buddhism clearly believes the later and Christianity waffles between the two.
I am going to assume the first, though at the end of the argument the second will seem plausable.
It is assumed that energy can neither be created nor destroyed, merely modified in various ways. I'm going to go with this theory, though I do wonder where all the energy came from in the first place. (Don't you dare say God! 8-)
So, you are born you live for ten seconds, you die. Sorry, I'm cruel and life AIN'T fair.
There was a fully formed, conscious, sentient being inhabiting the body. Granted for a brief time, but non the less there it is. The body is dead. Where is the spirit, the life energy?
OK, view #1 the obvious: the energy breaks down and discipates into the surrounding space.
View #2: The energy has gained consciousness and in keeping with the theory of evolution has evolved into a self sustaining entity with a will and life of its own. While born and living in the flesh it gained fuel to grow through the life cycle of the body and when the body died it sought the life energy elsewhere.
What does it do now and where it lives is not really germain to this argument. The important point is, is this theory possible? Is it possible for cognisant, conscious energy to be self sustaining outside the confines of a physical body?
If so, we have a case for life after death ... and from there, God knows what. Ask the next ghost you see.
Obviously there are a myriad of offered answers from "of course not" to "of course." Few people allow for a maybe.
In order to answer the question though, there seems to be a more fundemental question: Is life after death possible and if so is it scienifically defensable?
We have the obvious problem with belief in God: the existance of God is unprovable. As a being outside of time and space, he is by that nature, beyond the constructs of science. Ergo, we must have faith - or not.
On the otherhand, since we, human beings, are finite beings existing within the confines of time and space, if we continue to exist in any form, it should be observable and if so, provable.
A major presupposition in the belief in God, and major Holy Books of the great religions, is the belief in life after death. We go to a better world. Or in the case of the terrible twins, a not so better world (maybe).
So, how do we prove that life after death is possible? Do you believe in ghosts, spirits, ufos (oops, wrong argument)?
Is life after death possible? If so, how? Spirit? Energy? There are many views on this. Are we physical beings that generated a conscious energy at birth or are we energy beings that inhabited the physical body at birth. Buddhism clearly believes the later and Christianity waffles between the two.
I am going to assume the first, though at the end of the argument the second will seem plausable.
It is assumed that energy can neither be created nor destroyed, merely modified in various ways. I'm going to go with this theory, though I do wonder where all the energy came from in the first place. (Don't you dare say God! 8-)
So, you are born you live for ten seconds, you die. Sorry, I'm cruel and life AIN'T fair.
There was a fully formed, conscious, sentient being inhabiting the body. Granted for a brief time, but non the less there it is. The body is dead. Where is the spirit, the life energy?
OK, view #1 the obvious: the energy breaks down and discipates into the surrounding space.
View #2: The energy has gained consciousness and in keeping with the theory of evolution has evolved into a self sustaining entity with a will and life of its own. While born and living in the flesh it gained fuel to grow through the life cycle of the body and when the body died it sought the life energy elsewhere.
What does it do now and where it lives is not really germain to this argument. The important point is, is this theory possible? Is it possible for cognisant, conscious energy to be self sustaining outside the confines of a physical body?
If so, we have a case for life after death ... and from there, God knows what. Ask the next ghost you see.
Thursday, November 5, 2009
Christopher Hitchens and Richard Dawkins
Christopher Hitchens and Richard Dawkins, the terrible twins of modern scientific materialism, who regularly make fools of religious leaders stupid enough to publicly debate them on their own stage, seem to have put to rest the notion that there is a God. They assert that the idea of a God or many gods is so much pablum used to comfort a baby as it grows; but once in adulthood is no longer needed.
My question: Are the terrible twins right; is there no god? Or is it that science is inadequate to the task of defining something "beyond time and space" and they are little more than sophisticated doubting Thomases enthrawled with the ability to describe the elephant, but missing the bigger picture?
How would you fare against the terrible twins?
My question: Are the terrible twins right; is there no god? Or is it that science is inadequate to the task of defining something "beyond time and space" and they are little more than sophisticated doubting Thomases enthrawled with the ability to describe the elephant, but missing the bigger picture?
How would you fare against the terrible twins?
Wednesday, November 4, 2009
Bahasa Indonesia
Indonesia is the next manufacturing center of Japan. It may come as a surprise to the workers of Japan but next year many of them are going to start losing their jobs as manufacturing giants start to pull up stakes and move to the friendly shores of the southern superstate.
Leading Japanese industries have discovered, to the impending dismay of their local employees, that Indonesia offers a very inviting social and business climate in which to do business. And it is ever so much cheaper.
As profits are squeezed, auto and industrial giants are looking for new ways to save money - with the added benefit of tapping into a huge up and coming market. Doing business in China is difficult at best and the population is somewhat unfriendly, not to mention the government restrictions. When you add the costs of corruption and pocket lining, the cost of business is ... costly.
You may ask why they would want to leave the friendly and comfortable environment of central Japan. Well, its not so friendly when you get the bill. Taxes, salaries and those added monthly benefits (like transportation costs for commuting workers) are very substantial and the new crops coming out of the university employee pool are proving weak.
Indonesians are educated, highly motivated and seriously less expensive to hire and train. The taxes are a fraction of what they are in Japan and the employee benefits packages vastly under priced due to the lower cost of living.
Even when you concider the costs of moving Japanese management personnel, the benefits to any profit driven industry are astounding.
Additional benefits include room to grow, excellent shipping location with easier access to future markets in Southeast Asia, India and Africa. Indonesia is clean but India is a dirty and uncomfortable place to live which is a big reason India lost out.
So for you future up and coming business mavens, what lanuage should you study?
Leading Japanese industries have discovered, to the impending dismay of their local employees, that Indonesia offers a very inviting social and business climate in which to do business. And it is ever so much cheaper.
As profits are squeezed, auto and industrial giants are looking for new ways to save money - with the added benefit of tapping into a huge up and coming market. Doing business in China is difficult at best and the population is somewhat unfriendly, not to mention the government restrictions. When you add the costs of corruption and pocket lining, the cost of business is ... costly.
You may ask why they would want to leave the friendly and comfortable environment of central Japan. Well, its not so friendly when you get the bill. Taxes, salaries and those added monthly benefits (like transportation costs for commuting workers) are very substantial and the new crops coming out of the university employee pool are proving weak.
Indonesians are educated, highly motivated and seriously less expensive to hire and train. The taxes are a fraction of what they are in Japan and the employee benefits packages vastly under priced due to the lower cost of living.
Even when you concider the costs of moving Japanese management personnel, the benefits to any profit driven industry are astounding.
Additional benefits include room to grow, excellent shipping location with easier access to future markets in Southeast Asia, India and Africa. Indonesia is clean but India is a dirty and uncomfortable place to live which is a big reason India lost out.
So for you future up and coming business mavens, what lanuage should you study?
International-interracial Marraige
Is it possible for an international/interracial marraige to be successful? "In sickness and in health, for richer or poorer, til' death do us part" - is it real or fantasy?
In Japan we have heard many sad stories of children suffering from broken international/interracial marraiges between Japanese women and western men. Is there a more fundemental problem? Are these marraiges of convenience or status enhancers, easy paths to a visa or an exciting life outside the tight confines of family; or are they real? If real, what is the glue that binds?
A Louisiana Justice of the Peace just resigned in America because of the flack he experienced for denying a marraige license to a multi-racial couple. Why would he do that in today's society? Why indeed. His reason: he was concerned the children would suffer the slings and arrows of social stigma. Perhaps an unreasonable fear in America but certainly not in Japan.
Why would anyone put themselves through marrying someone when they have no common ground to stand on and must confront an 'alien' culture, language and body habits 24/7? Love? What is love and how long does it last? Is it infatuation? Lust? A common goal in life - ticket out (or in)?
When Tevye asked his wife Golde, "Do you love me?", what did she say?
She thought the question was foolish, but she eventually admitted that, after 25 years of living and struggling together and raising five daughters, she did. How many today, inter anything or not, concider before their wedding day where they will be in twenty five years?
Do you love me?
In Japan we have heard many sad stories of children suffering from broken international/interracial marraiges between Japanese women and western men. Is there a more fundemental problem? Are these marraiges of convenience or status enhancers, easy paths to a visa or an exciting life outside the tight confines of family; or are they real? If real, what is the glue that binds?
A Louisiana Justice of the Peace just resigned in America because of the flack he experienced for denying a marraige license to a multi-racial couple. Why would he do that in today's society? Why indeed. His reason: he was concerned the children would suffer the slings and arrows of social stigma. Perhaps an unreasonable fear in America but certainly not in Japan.
Why would anyone put themselves through marrying someone when they have no common ground to stand on and must confront an 'alien' culture, language and body habits 24/7? Love? What is love and how long does it last? Is it infatuation? Lust? A common goal in life - ticket out (or in)?
When Tevye asked his wife Golde, "Do you love me?", what did she say?
She thought the question was foolish, but she eventually admitted that, after 25 years of living and struggling together and raising five daughters, she did. How many today, inter anything or not, concider before their wedding day where they will be in twenty five years?
Do you love me?
Friday, October 23, 2009
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
Hiroshima and Nagasaki as Olympic Co-Hosts
Should the two cities bid be allowed go forward as 'co-hosts' of the Olympics? Can Hiroshima and Nagasaki pull it off or is it just a pipedream?
On the one hand it seems like a great idea. In an age when peace is more and more on the minds of everyone, the two cities have a unique place on the world stage. And as the last bidding war final scenes in Denmark showed, it's not really a city bid as much as a national honor. Presidents and Prime Ministers don't usually fly off to international venues just to help out local cities with their issues.
The idea also has merit in these financially stressed times when one city, no matter how large, may no longer be able to afford to pay the overwhelming cost of such an international event.
There is precedent. Japan and Korea co-hosted the Soccer championships a few years ago and that seemed to work, but with such a large event as the Olympics, there are some basic practical matters that seem to need working out before a bid could be taken seriously.
Where would the openning and closing ceremonies be held, one on each city? That actually sounds fantastic. But how would crowds be moved from their hotels in one city to venues in another?
More problematic would be, where the Olympic village will be? Will there be two? Will the national team atheletes be divided with, say gymnastic atheletes living in one city and track and field participants in a different city? If they live together, how will they get to their venues in the other city? Will there be private high speed trains between cities or will they have to spend tiring hours on buses each way everyday?
Hiroshima and Nagasaki are not 'twin cities' like Tokyo and Yokohama or Osaka and Kobe. There is a sizable distance between them which, unless adequately addressed, would be a show stopper.
I hope they come up with a plan, it would be cool to see it happen, but like some in the IOC, I'm a bit dubious of success.
On the one hand it seems like a great idea. In an age when peace is more and more on the minds of everyone, the two cities have a unique place on the world stage. And as the last bidding war final scenes in Denmark showed, it's not really a city bid as much as a national honor. Presidents and Prime Ministers don't usually fly off to international venues just to help out local cities with their issues.
The idea also has merit in these financially stressed times when one city, no matter how large, may no longer be able to afford to pay the overwhelming cost of such an international event.
There is precedent. Japan and Korea co-hosted the Soccer championships a few years ago and that seemed to work, but with such a large event as the Olympics, there are some basic practical matters that seem to need working out before a bid could be taken seriously.
Where would the openning and closing ceremonies be held, one on each city? That actually sounds fantastic. But how would crowds be moved from their hotels in one city to venues in another?
More problematic would be, where the Olympic village will be? Will there be two? Will the national team atheletes be divided with, say gymnastic atheletes living in one city and track and field participants in a different city? If they live together, how will they get to their venues in the other city? Will there be private high speed trains between cities or will they have to spend tiring hours on buses each way everyday?
Hiroshima and Nagasaki are not 'twin cities' like Tokyo and Yokohama or Osaka and Kobe. There is a sizable distance between them which, unless adequately addressed, would be a show stopper.
I hope they come up with a plan, it would be cool to see it happen, but like some in the IOC, I'm a bit dubious of success.
Monday, October 5, 2009
Dollar Needs Resusitator
The Arab states have launched secret moves together with China,
Russia and France to stop using the US currency for oil trading
The end of dollar dealings for oil with moves to a basket of currencies including the Japanese yen and Chinese yuan, the euro, gold and a new, currency planned for the nations in the Gulf Co-operation Council is being planned.
The dollar will need CPR soon as a result of America's greedy and gluttonous lifestyle. The congress spends money as if it were toilet paper - and soon it will be worth as much.
If the dollar keeps losing value it will soon be uneconomical for Americans to buy foriegn oil. This doesn't really worry people so much beause they think with all the refineries in the US, it won't be a problem to get gas for my car.
Think again!
Russia and France to stop using the US currency for oil trading
The end of dollar dealings for oil with moves to a basket of currencies including the Japanese yen and Chinese yuan, the euro, gold and a new, currency planned for the nations in the Gulf Co-operation Council is being planned.
The dollar will need CPR soon as a result of America's greedy and gluttonous lifestyle. The congress spends money as if it were toilet paper - and soon it will be worth as much.
If the dollar keeps losing value it will soon be uneconomical for Americans to buy foriegn oil. This doesn't really worry people so much beause they think with all the refineries in the US, it won't be a problem to get gas for my car.
Think again!
Wednesday, September 16, 2009
When and How to Pull the Plug?
People have been raising the roof recently about Death Committees being instituted and death advisors in the Health Care bill before Congress.
Obviously this concept has a myriad of politically incorrect pitfalls, like deciding who should and shouldn't die. Grandma or the mentally 'challenged' kid about to be born. Nazi and Stalinist purification come to mind.
There are so many conflicting interests here it's just safer to say nothing. But, in saying nothing these procedures are happening and will happen much more often.
People will ask, why? We are children of God, how can we kill our brother or sister? Those who are Darwinists should logically support culling the herd of the weak and infirm; but they won't because we have natural human rights.
So, let's look at the problem straight forward:
We are all in a boat, limited resources and limited space. Get it?
How about, no one likes to share (even though they say we should) and while some people are hording a little excess food and a nicer seat, others only have cramped spaces and a handful of rice. The boat is getting really dirty and really smelly and really crowded. It is impossible to keep clean with more and more people cramming into the boat and everyone is fighting over the space they have and won't help each other, so in reality things are going to hell fast.
What to do? Overcrowding in a garbage can isn't a great life.
Obviously we know what we should do, ought to do and want to do but NO ONE will do it. So, what DO we do?
Someone once said Its better to live a shorter happy life than a long suffering one. Perhaps its even better to never live at all. Crazy idea.
Is grandma happy stuck to the machine in bed and unable to move for however long her body can be made to function or should she go home to her family with reasonable care and enjoy her days?
Dangerous question: If we know a child is going to be born with a lifelong incapacitation, should we allow him or her to be born?
If we are going to have health care for everyone there will obviously have to be limits. I don't envy the government bureaucrats who have to enforce those limits because they will have to address these issues everyday: who lives, who dies. It will make the private insurance companies today seem like nice guys.
What is the definition of quality of life? When does the medical procedure become unreasonable? Soon we will be able to mechanically replace nearly every part of our body. We will be able to live to the ripe old age of 5,000 as a bio-robot. People die, all things die. The circle goes on, but how far should we stretch it? Should we stop it? Can the earth sustain that? Should we worry about it?
Ah, and speaking of sustaining things. If you now have private Blue Cross / Blue Shield, what are the premiums each year? Everyone, listen up: The new Health Care bill will require premiums be paid by every singla American. What are premiums called when the government collects them? Let me hear you say it: A TAX. That's right. In fact it will be a great big tax. I'm guessing $3,000 per year for a 30 year old single man to start out, with cost of living increases every few years. What do you think a family of four will have to pay?
* Just for your info; In Japan, I pay $3,000 per year for a family of three PLUS I have private supplimental which is on top of that. My wife is a housewife so she doesn't work. This brings the premium down some. The US will be equivelant. Bet on it.
Oh, and one more thing: there isn't a box to check if you want to opt out. You will be required to have a National Medical Care account and carry a card. You may have supplimental private coverage - and you can bet it will be available; but basic care coverage by all will be the law.
Oh, and one more more thing. Since you will have to pay for each child each month, I predict this will be one of the most effective birth control measures in history.
Talk about a motivating factor to pull the plug!
Obviously this concept has a myriad of politically incorrect pitfalls, like deciding who should and shouldn't die. Grandma or the mentally 'challenged' kid about to be born. Nazi and Stalinist purification come to mind.
There are so many conflicting interests here it's just safer to say nothing. But, in saying nothing these procedures are happening and will happen much more often.
People will ask, why? We are children of God, how can we kill our brother or sister? Those who are Darwinists should logically support culling the herd of the weak and infirm; but they won't because we have natural human rights.
So, let's look at the problem straight forward:
We are all in a boat, limited resources and limited space. Get it?
How about, no one likes to share (even though they say we should) and while some people are hording a little excess food and a nicer seat, others only have cramped spaces and a handful of rice. The boat is getting really dirty and really smelly and really crowded. It is impossible to keep clean with more and more people cramming into the boat and everyone is fighting over the space they have and won't help each other, so in reality things are going to hell fast.
What to do? Overcrowding in a garbage can isn't a great life.
Obviously we know what we should do, ought to do and want to do but NO ONE will do it. So, what DO we do?
Someone once said Its better to live a shorter happy life than a long suffering one. Perhaps its even better to never live at all. Crazy idea.
Is grandma happy stuck to the machine in bed and unable to move for however long her body can be made to function or should she go home to her family with reasonable care and enjoy her days?
Dangerous question: If we know a child is going to be born with a lifelong incapacitation, should we allow him or her to be born?
If we are going to have health care for everyone there will obviously have to be limits. I don't envy the government bureaucrats who have to enforce those limits because they will have to address these issues everyday: who lives, who dies. It will make the private insurance companies today seem like nice guys.
What is the definition of quality of life? When does the medical procedure become unreasonable? Soon we will be able to mechanically replace nearly every part of our body. We will be able to live to the ripe old age of 5,000 as a bio-robot. People die, all things die. The circle goes on, but how far should we stretch it? Should we stop it? Can the earth sustain that? Should we worry about it?
Ah, and speaking of sustaining things. If you now have private Blue Cross / Blue Shield, what are the premiums each year? Everyone, listen up: The new Health Care bill will require premiums be paid by every singla American. What are premiums called when the government collects them? Let me hear you say it: A TAX. That's right. In fact it will be a great big tax. I'm guessing $3,000 per year for a 30 year old single man to start out, with cost of living increases every few years. What do you think a family of four will have to pay?
* Just for your info; In Japan, I pay $3,000 per year for a family of three PLUS I have private supplimental which is on top of that. My wife is a housewife so she doesn't work. This brings the premium down some. The US will be equivelant. Bet on it.
Oh, and one more thing: there isn't a box to check if you want to opt out. You will be required to have a National Medical Care account and carry a card. You may have supplimental private coverage - and you can bet it will be available; but basic care coverage by all will be the law.
Oh, and one more more thing. Since you will have to pay for each child each month, I predict this will be one of the most effective birth control measures in history.
Talk about a motivating factor to pull the plug!
The Dance is Over - but the Circle Goes On
When I saw how old Patrick was when he died I was really really shocked.
Tuesday, September 15, 2009
Ok, You Want to Live in Japan (with Your Japanese Husband)
As any number of people will tell you, living in Japan is cool. Yes, as a foreigner you will have some limitations but unless you have unreasonable expectations, and if you get into the spirit, you really should enjoy life here.
Things to think about:
1.Do you like fish?
Japan is widely known for its healthy food (yes there are McDonald's for your homesick days). Japanese food is healthy and for the most part, delicious. Personally, I hate natto, but my wife and daughter love it. Go figure.
2.Do you feel safe?
Japan really is a safe country. There's a reason people are afraid to leave Japan. For this reason it is a great place for kids.
3.Culture and Outdoor activities
There is an amazing variety of things to do, see and go to. You could pick up a new hobby every month and the more Japanese you learn, the more very fancy doors will open.
4.Korea is just across the street.
OK, not really but if you have a kimchi fetish it's only an hour away. If you are American you get American prices even if you live in Japan.
5.Get a Job and stay busy.
You will have no upwardly mobile pressure. No one expects you to actually work. Just get a p/t job teaching English. You do this to keep busy and make spending money and avoid being lonely.
6.Lots and lots of free time
Study, study, study Japanese. When you have kids if you can't talk to their teachers and doctor you will be at a great disadvantage. Take up hobbies, Karate, flower arranging, tea ceremony – the list is endless.
7.Learn what your husband likes and learn to please him.
You might get him to come home a little earlier at night.
8.Learn your husband's favorite foods from his mother.
Suicide or murder are not an option. She will give you the stamp of approval for Heaven.
9.Have kids.
Then everyone in the family will love you (the grandkids actually) and you will be happy.
10.Your home is your life.
Things to think about:
1.Do you like fish?
Japan is widely known for its healthy food (yes there are McDonald's for your homesick days). Japanese food is healthy and for the most part, delicious. Personally, I hate natto, but my wife and daughter love it. Go figure.
2.Do you feel safe?
Japan really is a safe country. There's a reason people are afraid to leave Japan. For this reason it is a great place for kids.
3.Culture and Outdoor activities
There is an amazing variety of things to do, see and go to. You could pick up a new hobby every month and the more Japanese you learn, the more very fancy doors will open.
4.Korea is just across the street.
OK, not really but if you have a kimchi fetish it's only an hour away. If you are American you get American prices even if you live in Japan.
5.Get a Job and stay busy.
You will have no upwardly mobile pressure. No one expects you to actually work. Just get a p/t job teaching English. You do this to keep busy and make spending money and avoid being lonely.
6.Lots and lots of free time
Study, study, study Japanese. When you have kids if you can't talk to their teachers and doctor you will be at a great disadvantage. Take up hobbies, Karate, flower arranging, tea ceremony – the list is endless.
7.Learn what your husband likes and learn to please him.
You might get him to come home a little earlier at night.
8.Learn your husband's favorite foods from his mother.
Suicide or murder are not an option. She will give you the stamp of approval for Heaven.
9.Have kids.
Then everyone in the family will love you (the grandkids actually) and you will be happy.
10.Your home is your life.
Monday, September 14, 2009
So, You Want to Marry a Japanese Man?
I was asked my view on marraige and life in Japan for an American woman. Well, I'm an American man married to a Japanese woman so I can't completely identify with your plight, but I can give some insight.
A few things to think about:
1. Japanese men are afraid to leave home.
It doesn't matter if they have lived half their life outside of Japan, they are Japanese. A leopard can not change his stripes. Buddhist, Shinto, Christian or other, it's the same. You can take the man out of Japan but you can't take Japan out of the man. 20 years of life outside Japan down the drain after 5 minutes back in Japan. Young Japanese men sometimes spend a few weeks outside of Japan, but when they return they do a startling imitation of a hermit crab. Japan is safe; like a protective shell. They leave again only under great duress. (also see #5)
2. Japanese men are mamma's boys. (Japan is the Mother's Kingdom)
Their mother's dote on them, spoil them, protect them beyond reason and just generally make it so the boy never really grows up and leaves her. Because of this Japanese men have strong depenancy issues. They call this being a team player, but it really means momma made all the decisions and I don't know how. It is the unusual man who can act independently. Ergo, they are afraid to leave home (Japan)
3. You are the new mom; be like the old mom.
Your Japanese husband will expect you to be his mother first, wife second and mother third. Get used to it. (Reiko says learn how to make miso soup like mom or your husband will complain and go to a restaurant.)
4. Japanese men find self worth in their Jobs (not from God - though they think their boss is god).
A Japanese man has no value without a Job. The better the job ... you got it.
If you are the wife, don't get a better job or higher leadership position because it will mean you are:
a, Better than him (you're a woman, impossible)
b. You are my wife, you can never be equal or better (even if I say so)
c. You are my wife/mother, why aren't you at home making babies, my dinner, doing laundry etc
4a As a corolary to 4: (The Boss is God)
The husband is a slave to his job/boss. He will work all day and all night. He will forget who you are (unless he needs his laundry - or something else from you) and his children will never get to know him. This is changing little by little because of the recession but it is not a natural change.
5. A Japanese man is Japanese. You are not, will never be, cannot be.
That says so much you can not believe how understated that statement is.
"You can never understand me. Japan is a unique culture and you are not Japanese."
Remember this phrase and every time you want to complain, you will hear him say those words to you.
6. Learn Japanese
If you cannot speak Japanese don't bother speaking. No one will listen
Your husband spent at least 6 years studying English in school.
He will not be able to put two coherent words together to save his life.
7. Don't bother learning Japanese
You're not Japanese, no one will listen
You're a woman, even your kids (boys) won't listen
8. You are NOT one of US. (Uchi – Soto)
You are an outsider, your husband's accessory. If he isn't there, neither are you.
You are not one of us, we don't have to consider you (This is a MAJOR complaint of foriegn women in Japan - they are seriously dissed by Japanese female members of their same groups.You are NOT one of US why are you here?)
We marvel at your difference. Your so cute. Oh, what beautiful eyes. Be quiet.
This all might sound a little intimidating but it isn't necessarily all bad if you can surpress your American independent streak and decide you want to be a traditional housewife with relatively lesser outside duties to support your husband and family. Your life can be rather good and happy. (Reiko says if your husband is from the country-side you may have no hope unless you have a lot of patience.) You will never reach the level of professionalism in Japan that you can in America. Japan is a feudal country and women are second class citizens. In Japan you will always be a second class outsider viewed with suspicion. Some say Tokyo is a little easier.
Or you can avoid living in Japan altogether and hope that with a lot of husband training and patience on your part, you and your husband will find common ground. Periods of separation serve a valuable purpose.
Conversely, being an American man married to a Japanese woman is like Heaven. 8-)
A few things to think about:
1. Japanese men are afraid to leave home.
It doesn't matter if they have lived half their life outside of Japan, they are Japanese. A leopard can not change his stripes. Buddhist, Shinto, Christian or other, it's the same. You can take the man out of Japan but you can't take Japan out of the man. 20 years of life outside Japan down the drain after 5 minutes back in Japan. Young Japanese men sometimes spend a few weeks outside of Japan, but when they return they do a startling imitation of a hermit crab. Japan is safe; like a protective shell. They leave again only under great duress. (also see #5)
2. Japanese men are mamma's boys. (Japan is the Mother's Kingdom)
Their mother's dote on them, spoil them, protect them beyond reason and just generally make it so the boy never really grows up and leaves her. Because of this Japanese men have strong depenancy issues. They call this being a team player, but it really means momma made all the decisions and I don't know how. It is the unusual man who can act independently. Ergo, they are afraid to leave home (Japan)
3. You are the new mom; be like the old mom.
Your Japanese husband will expect you to be his mother first, wife second and mother third. Get used to it. (Reiko says learn how to make miso soup like mom or your husband will complain and go to a restaurant.)
4. Japanese men find self worth in their Jobs (not from God - though they think their boss is god).
A Japanese man has no value without a Job. The better the job ... you got it.
If you are the wife, don't get a better job or higher leadership position because it will mean you are:
a, Better than him (you're a woman, impossible)
b. You are my wife, you can never be equal or better (even if I say so)
c. You are my wife/mother, why aren't you at home making babies, my dinner, doing laundry etc
4a As a corolary to 4: (The Boss is God)
The husband is a slave to his job/boss. He will work all day and all night. He will forget who you are (unless he needs his laundry - or something else from you) and his children will never get to know him. This is changing little by little because of the recession but it is not a natural change.
5. A Japanese man is Japanese. You are not, will never be, cannot be.
That says so much you can not believe how understated that statement is.
"You can never understand me. Japan is a unique culture and you are not Japanese."
Remember this phrase and every time you want to complain, you will hear him say those words to you.
6. Learn Japanese
If you cannot speak Japanese don't bother speaking. No one will listen
Your husband spent at least 6 years studying English in school.
He will not be able to put two coherent words together to save his life.
7. Don't bother learning Japanese
You're not Japanese, no one will listen
You're a woman, even your kids (boys) won't listen
8. You are NOT one of US. (Uchi – Soto)
You are an outsider, your husband's accessory. If he isn't there, neither are you.
You are not one of us, we don't have to consider you (This is a MAJOR complaint of foriegn women in Japan - they are seriously dissed by Japanese female members of their same groups.You are NOT one of US why are you here?)
We marvel at your difference. Your so cute. Oh, what beautiful eyes. Be quiet.
This all might sound a little intimidating but it isn't necessarily all bad if you can surpress your American independent streak and decide you want to be a traditional housewife with relatively lesser outside duties to support your husband and family. Your life can be rather good and happy. (Reiko says if your husband is from the country-side you may have no hope unless you have a lot of patience.) You will never reach the level of professionalism in Japan that you can in America. Japan is a feudal country and women are second class citizens. In Japan you will always be a second class outsider viewed with suspicion. Some say Tokyo is a little easier.
Or you can avoid living in Japan altogether and hope that with a lot of husband training and patience on your part, you and your husband will find common ground. Periods of separation serve a valuable purpose.
Conversely, being an American man married to a Japanese woman is like Heaven. 8-)
Are You Really an Atheist?
My friend is very smart. He tells me there is no such thing as God so he is an atheist. I of course tell him he is not, where upon he bristles at my presumption (I am not as smart) and the animated conversation begins.
My friend explains (probably as one does to a child) that there is no proof and no way to scientifically prove the existence of God. Ergo, no God.
Now me, being slightly more pragmatic in my thinking (and not wanting to unduly upset anything I can't see and that CAN put my name on a meteor) says, now wait a minute. How can you say there is no God? Ra has been sitting in the sky since ... well, since forever. Ra being the ostentatious God he is, makes his presence quite obvious I say. You say you don't believe. Yet after some time under his beneficence you go in search of a glass of water. What's the deal?
It's like those philosophers you talk about who say nothing is real, then go off to get their paycheck.
Of course this goes on 'til I shut up and my friend concludes the superior intellect won. Too bad my friend doesn't remember Troy.
I'll be back ....
(like any fable, this story is full of metaphors and innuendos, the names have been changed to protect the guilty)
Personally, I think my friend is a closet tree worshipper and just afraid to admit it.
My friend explains (probably as one does to a child) that there is no proof and no way to scientifically prove the existence of God. Ergo, no God.
Now me, being slightly more pragmatic in my thinking (and not wanting to unduly upset anything I can't see and that CAN put my name on a meteor) says, now wait a minute. How can you say there is no God? Ra has been sitting in the sky since ... well, since forever. Ra being the ostentatious God he is, makes his presence quite obvious I say. You say you don't believe. Yet after some time under his beneficence you go in search of a glass of water. What's the deal?
It's like those philosophers you talk about who say nothing is real, then go off to get their paycheck.
Of course this goes on 'til I shut up and my friend concludes the superior intellect won. Too bad my friend doesn't remember Troy.
I'll be back ....
(like any fable, this story is full of metaphors and innuendos, the names have been changed to protect the guilty)
Personally, I think my friend is a closet tree worshipper and just afraid to admit it.
Sunday, September 13, 2009
Morality in the Health Care Debate
A response to the Japan Times Herald article:
Being quite the fan of Ayn Rand myself, I expect that I would be on the mall if I could.
The founding principle of the US and the Republican/Conservative movement is self reliance. The right to be your own man (or woman).
There is, however a balancing principle. The Christian ethic: I am my brother's keeper as exemplified in Cain's question to God.
Either principle taken to extreme is a disaster. The independent man becomes little more than a bear in the forest, while a true Christian gets nailed to a cross by the jealous rivalry between competing interests.
What is the solution?
I would offer the model of the traditional family unit. Husband/wife/children. How does it work? Who has what rights and responsibilities? Where is the balance? This was a short coming of Ayn's philosophy – she only considered the individual, not the relationship – though perhaps if Dagny had kids ...
The modern destruction of the ideal of the nuclear family by relativistic morality where no one understands his or her position in relationships and the prevailing socialist concept of government being the great benefactor of all, muddies the moral waters a great deal.
The American constitution was written to protect us from the monarchic government and to ensure each of our basic rights in the Bill of Rights. But the founding fathers were also socially moral men who understood their obligation to society. To them society was an extension of their own family, with the rights, privileges and responsibilities that ensue. There is no free ride.
Bleeding hearts may call me heartless, but you can only squeeze blood from a turnip for so long before it dies and by the same token, you can only abuse your brothers and sisters in society by your selfish laziness, taking what you want regardless, for so long before the society that you are milking goes dry. This applies to the wall street robber barons as well as the morally irresponsible drug addicts, sexually misaligned, single mothers and those who could not control their physical and emotional urges and now must live with the effect. Why should society put up with your irresponsible lifestyle? It is one thing to support the defenseless children, but quite another to teach and countenance irresponsible adult behavior.
“How can you say that about single mothers? They are the victims.” Really? In some cases of rape perhaps, and society has the ability to care medically for those cases; but in most cases, they are not the victims, they are part and parcel of a slothful society that teaches irresponsible lifestyle choices. The men must also be held accountable. Those who cannot control their snake must bear the cost of their offspring. Life is full of choices. Whether you make the right choice or the wrong choice it is YOUR choice and YOUR responsibility to deal with the results. Children who use skateboards without helmets unfortunately learn that the hard way. So do those with HIV/AIDS. While we do have the resources to care for accident victims and the casualties of life, we do not have the resources to take care of the overwhelming numbers of moral dropouts this degenerating society is producing. This is a classic indicator of a society on the cusp of a fall.
One moral question being asked is, should illegal aliens be covered by medical insurance? The sticking point of course is the word illegal. There seems to be a part in Common Law, which our law is based on, that covers one's use of something or living somewhere that does not belong to them. If, after a certain length of time of use without the owners objection, you can legitimately assert a claim on it. Well, since the US government, who claims ownership over the land these people are living on, seems to be allowing it – the illegal are defacto, no longer illegal. Moreover, these marginally legal residents work, pay taxes and contribute to society and generally have a higher moral standard than most university graduates. It seems that they have earned the right to have medical insurance as they are not generally a burden on society.
Our medical system is set up to care for those in society who have had unfortunate occurrences befall them in the course of a responsible lifestyle. Productive members of society, who for what ever reason must now be cared for. We can easily do that. The occasional unattached child or random victim of fate left out of society for what ever reason can be cared for, with assistance from a public fund, in the Christian spirit; but the general trend of the idea that “society owes me” is doomed to fail. "Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country." Do you remember that Kennedy brother?
Do socialized medical systems work? In Russia, yes it does; they have great doctors, mediocre equipment and if you want patient care in the hospital, your family must come in and do it. In England, yes it does. You have relatively good doctors and relatively good equipment and relatively good emergency care. But if you don't have an emergency you need to go through the system and wait your turn. Canada is the same. Both England and Canada have more and more budget limitations so things are breaking down. Private service seems to be becoming more popular. Japan is a bit better but doctors and hospitals are getting more tight and turn away more patients.
Make no mistake, America does already have a 'socialized' medical system supported by taxpayers. Medi-care, Medi-cal (California), the VA and others allow for people to walk-in or be transported by ambulance and get reasonable care. Not the best care or the most up to snuff medical procedures, but reasonable. Of course the government will try to recoup their expense from you, but if you can't pay they won't let you die. It is against the law for a hospital to refuse you service. So, yes illegal aliens, whether from Mexico or Mars, can not be turned away.
The question is, do we want a fully socialized medical care system where I can get all my warts taken care of for free? What a stupid question, of course we do!
Being quite the fan of Ayn Rand myself, I expect that I would be on the mall if I could.
The founding principle of the US and the Republican/Conservative movement is self reliance. The right to be your own man (or woman).
There is, however a balancing principle. The Christian ethic: I am my brother's keeper as exemplified in Cain's question to God.
Either principle taken to extreme is a disaster. The independent man becomes little more than a bear in the forest, while a true Christian gets nailed to a cross by the jealous rivalry between competing interests.
What is the solution?
I would offer the model of the traditional family unit. Husband/wife/children. How does it work? Who has what rights and responsibilities? Where is the balance? This was a short coming of Ayn's philosophy – she only considered the individual, not the relationship – though perhaps if Dagny had kids ...
The modern destruction of the ideal of the nuclear family by relativistic morality where no one understands his or her position in relationships and the prevailing socialist concept of government being the great benefactor of all, muddies the moral waters a great deal.
The American constitution was written to protect us from the monarchic government and to ensure each of our basic rights in the Bill of Rights. But the founding fathers were also socially moral men who understood their obligation to society. To them society was an extension of their own family, with the rights, privileges and responsibilities that ensue. There is no free ride.
Bleeding hearts may call me heartless, but you can only squeeze blood from a turnip for so long before it dies and by the same token, you can only abuse your brothers and sisters in society by your selfish laziness, taking what you want regardless, for so long before the society that you are milking goes dry. This applies to the wall street robber barons as well as the morally irresponsible drug addicts, sexually misaligned, single mothers and those who could not control their physical and emotional urges and now must live with the effect. Why should society put up with your irresponsible lifestyle? It is one thing to support the defenseless children, but quite another to teach and countenance irresponsible adult behavior.
“How can you say that about single mothers? They are the victims.” Really? In some cases of rape perhaps, and society has the ability to care medically for those cases; but in most cases, they are not the victims, they are part and parcel of a slothful society that teaches irresponsible lifestyle choices. The men must also be held accountable. Those who cannot control their snake must bear the cost of their offspring. Life is full of choices. Whether you make the right choice or the wrong choice it is YOUR choice and YOUR responsibility to deal with the results. Children who use skateboards without helmets unfortunately learn that the hard way. So do those with HIV/AIDS. While we do have the resources to care for accident victims and the casualties of life, we do not have the resources to take care of the overwhelming numbers of moral dropouts this degenerating society is producing. This is a classic indicator of a society on the cusp of a fall.
One moral question being asked is, should illegal aliens be covered by medical insurance? The sticking point of course is the word illegal. There seems to be a part in Common Law, which our law is based on, that covers one's use of something or living somewhere that does not belong to them. If, after a certain length of time of use without the owners objection, you can legitimately assert a claim on it. Well, since the US government, who claims ownership over the land these people are living on, seems to be allowing it – the illegal are defacto, no longer illegal. Moreover, these marginally legal residents work, pay taxes and contribute to society and generally have a higher moral standard than most university graduates. It seems that they have earned the right to have medical insurance as they are not generally a burden on society.
Our medical system is set up to care for those in society who have had unfortunate occurrences befall them in the course of a responsible lifestyle. Productive members of society, who for what ever reason must now be cared for. We can easily do that. The occasional unattached child or random victim of fate left out of society for what ever reason can be cared for, with assistance from a public fund, in the Christian spirit; but the general trend of the idea that “society owes me” is doomed to fail. "Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country." Do you remember that Kennedy brother?
Do socialized medical systems work? In Russia, yes it does; they have great doctors, mediocre equipment and if you want patient care in the hospital, your family must come in and do it. In England, yes it does. You have relatively good doctors and relatively good equipment and relatively good emergency care. But if you don't have an emergency you need to go through the system and wait your turn. Canada is the same. Both England and Canada have more and more budget limitations so things are breaking down. Private service seems to be becoming more popular. Japan is a bit better but doctors and hospitals are getting more tight and turn away more patients.
Make no mistake, America does already have a 'socialized' medical system supported by taxpayers. Medi-care, Medi-cal (California), the VA and others allow for people to walk-in or be transported by ambulance and get reasonable care. Not the best care or the most up to snuff medical procedures, but reasonable. Of course the government will try to recoup their expense from you, but if you can't pay they won't let you die. It is against the law for a hospital to refuse you service. So, yes illegal aliens, whether from Mexico or Mars, can not be turned away.
The question is, do we want a fully socialized medical care system where I can get all my warts taken care of for free? What a stupid question, of course we do!
Saturday, September 12, 2009
Illegal Aliens and Health Insurance
President Obama said illegal aliens would not be covered by health insurance.
Congressman Wilson called him a liar.
Who is right? Well, actually Congressman Wilson was right, though he was unpardonably rude about it.
The House version protects illegal aliens but the Senate version 'sort of' doesn't. The Democrats are now running around trying to make an honest man of the president. Sort of.
What do you think?
Will the final bill say it is against the law for illegal aliens to be covered? No.
Will it say illegal aliens must pay for medical care? No.
What will it say about illegal aliens? Probably nothing.
Illegal aliens will not be covered by medical insurance, but the first hospital that refuses to admit a pregnant illegal alien will be in the courts and before Justice Sodomeyer so fast you would think it was a legal hurricane.
It will be declared unconstitutional discrimination. And from that time forward, legal resident's premiums and fees will cover the cost of illegal aliens pro bono health care. Kind of like no fault auto insurance.
How long will this take? I bet the day after Obama signs the bill, the woman will be walked into a selected hospital by three lawyers, a police witness and a dozen cameras. They will pick a federally funded hospital and an administrator who goes by the book. He will express his politically correct regrets and refuse service. Of course, after the cameras are turned off she will be admitted as a hardship case.
The next day, after the service is legally refused, someone will walk the legal mumbo jumbo document to the good justice's desk and she will sign an injunction against implimenting any restrictions. It will then be against the law to refuse service to anyone for anything based on immigration status. (of course it is already but, heh, we aren't going to let the facts interfere with a good political joust are we?)
I'm taking bets.
Congressman Wilson called him a liar.
Who is right? Well, actually Congressman Wilson was right, though he was unpardonably rude about it.
The House version protects illegal aliens but the Senate version 'sort of' doesn't. The Democrats are now running around trying to make an honest man of the president. Sort of.
What do you think?
Will the final bill say it is against the law for illegal aliens to be covered? No.
Will it say illegal aliens must pay for medical care? No.
What will it say about illegal aliens? Probably nothing.
Illegal aliens will not be covered by medical insurance, but the first hospital that refuses to admit a pregnant illegal alien will be in the courts and before Justice Sodomeyer so fast you would think it was a legal hurricane.
It will be declared unconstitutional discrimination. And from that time forward, legal resident's premiums and fees will cover the cost of illegal aliens pro bono health care. Kind of like no fault auto insurance.
How long will this take? I bet the day after Obama signs the bill, the woman will be walked into a selected hospital by three lawyers, a police witness and a dozen cameras. They will pick a federally funded hospital and an administrator who goes by the book. He will express his politically correct regrets and refuse service. Of course, after the cameras are turned off she will be admitted as a hardship case.
The next day, after the service is legally refused, someone will walk the legal mumbo jumbo document to the good justice's desk and she will sign an injunction against implimenting any restrictions. It will then be against the law to refuse service to anyone for anything based on immigration status. (of course it is already but, heh, we aren't going to let the facts interfere with a good political joust are we?)
I'm taking bets.
Friday, September 11, 2009
Children and Suicide in Japan
A response to the Japan Times Herald article:
A family walks into the supermarket and the child starts to misbehave. A stranger comes up and disciplines the child.
Generally speaking, parents don't like strangers yelling at their kids. I think this is much like the Japanese feeling towards foriegners (strangers) castigating them on their own 'family' behav ior.
As for the subject at hand, modern views on suicide in the west are firmly entrenched in the Judeo-Christian value of the human being as a child of God.
Without this concept, suicide, whether blatently steping in front of a Shinkansen or wandering off into the forest at old age, is concidered a normal part of society divesting itself of unneeded and/or excess hindrences in the path of healthy development.
People in the west (read: Christian, Jewish, Moslem) have a view that is different from older traditional norms and while it is true that the Abrahamic tradition is the majority today, it is not the older tradition, as you point out using Plato. Plato, remembered names in Greece, Rome, Egypt and countless unremembered names of people who committed and/or were given the 'honorable' way out to commit suicide
As I have pointed out in my past writings, I consider suicide the cowards way out and the ultimate screw you to anyone who loves or depends on you.
Child suicide and bullying in Japan mixes the equation with inept teaching and disciplinary methods (or lack of any method) and children just trying to escape the trap of pain as any rational being would. In traditional societies, child suicide is rare, though child mortality is not. Children are quite valuable and treated as such since their presence ensures the continuity of the farm, family and clan whereas in today's city culture children are more often seen as a hindrance and impediment to the freedom and lifestyle of the adults.
The modern city lifestyle is selfish and indulgent. Over crowding and the aberant behavior of unsupervised young is much like we see in elephant herds when the adolescent bulls are left without adults to guide them. Children in modern cities turn to running amock and those who aren't part of the 'in' crowd or can't handle the pressure are bullied into line or opt out.
The ultimate 'in' crowd for these adolescent societal losers is the suicide club.
But again, in the animist, shaminist view that underpins the East, the weak, infirm, elderly and just plain failures of society should do everyone a service and dispense with themselves. Its ultimately better for everyone. The bully is the tool nature uses to cull the herd or whip them into shape. There is a reason it's called the 'bully pulpit'. This is the view in Japan. And in history.
You may not like it. It may be wrong , there may be a better way; but interestingly, the idea that seems to be coming up in the health care debate about when to cut off care in hopeless or excessively expensive cases seems to hint at the circle returning of society deciding its time to walk out into the forest and die. Logan's Run?
A family walks into the supermarket and the child starts to misbehave. A stranger comes up and disciplines the child.
Generally speaking, parents don't like strangers yelling at their kids. I think this is much like the Japanese feeling towards foriegners (strangers) castigating them on their own 'family' behav ior.
As for the subject at hand, modern views on suicide in the west are firmly entrenched in the Judeo-Christian value of the human being as a child of God.
Without this concept, suicide, whether blatently steping in front of a Shinkansen or wandering off into the forest at old age, is concidered a normal part of society divesting itself of unneeded and/or excess hindrences in the path of healthy development.
People in the west (read: Christian, Jewish, Moslem) have a view that is different from older traditional norms and while it is true that the Abrahamic tradition is the majority today, it is not the older tradition, as you point out using Plato. Plato, remembered names in Greece, Rome, Egypt and countless unremembered names of people who committed and/or were given the 'honorable' way out to commit suicide
As I have pointed out in my past writings, I consider suicide the cowards way out and the ultimate screw you to anyone who loves or depends on you.
Child suicide and bullying in Japan mixes the equation with inept teaching and disciplinary methods (or lack of any method) and children just trying to escape the trap of pain as any rational being would. In traditional societies, child suicide is rare, though child mortality is not. Children are quite valuable and treated as such since their presence ensures the continuity of the farm, family and clan whereas in today's city culture children are more often seen as a hindrance and impediment to the freedom and lifestyle of the adults.
The modern city lifestyle is selfish and indulgent. Over crowding and the aberant behavior of unsupervised young is much like we see in elephant herds when the adolescent bulls are left without adults to guide them. Children in modern cities turn to running amock and those who aren't part of the 'in' crowd or can't handle the pressure are bullied into line or opt out.
The ultimate 'in' crowd for these adolescent societal losers is the suicide club.
But again, in the animist, shaminist view that underpins the East, the weak, infirm, elderly and just plain failures of society should do everyone a service and dispense with themselves. Its ultimately better for everyone. The bully is the tool nature uses to cull the herd or whip them into shape. There is a reason it's called the 'bully pulpit'. This is the view in Japan. And in history.
You may not like it. It may be wrong , there may be a better way; but interestingly, the idea that seems to be coming up in the health care debate about when to cut off care in hopeless or excessively expensive cases seems to hint at the circle returning of society deciding its time to walk out into the forest and die. Logan's Run?
Tuesday, September 8, 2009
ABC Can You Believe?
Even mainstream might be getting nervous.
Personally I like this approach: I think congress should pass the law to give everyone all the health care they need and want. This will make the bleeding hearts happy.
The doctors will get paid by the same people who are paying the auto dealers for all the "cash for clunkers" they took in (but haven't seen a dime for yet), so the doctors will all go bankrupt and say "what the hell am I doing this for?" They will quit because they can't pay their bills. We will then all be entitled to the same care no one can get. So the far right will be happy.
We can then all take mid-afternoon naps, elect a famous model for the next president, drink ourselves into a contented stupor (our money will have no value so you better learn how to make your own) and join Mexico. Then Mexico will be happy cause they got their land back.
Everyone wins, Olay!
Sunday, September 6, 2009
Hey Mr Congressman, I want YOUR Health Care Plan
Why can't we all have the public health care plan all our congressional public servants have? Oh, I forgot, WE are THEIR public servants.
We need a PRIVATE health insurance plan, run by PRIVATE insurance companies with PUBLIC sponsorship. That means, if my premium is $100, the government should pay 70%.
BUT ALL premiums for children up to 18 should be 100% paid by the government to private insurance companies - perhaps through their schools. And university students should be spnsored through their university plan regardless of age. This will inspire kids to go to university.
Congress should make it illegal for insurance companies to cancel policies.
If someone losses their job or is homeless then the government should pick up the tab 100%.
And doctors need to be protected from law suits. Errors and corrective treatment should be addressed through additional medical treatment. If the doctor's mistake shows incompitence or neglect they should lose their license to practice. Lawyers need to get off the gravy train.
How about that?
We need a PRIVATE health insurance plan, run by PRIVATE insurance companies with PUBLIC sponsorship. That means, if my premium is $100, the government should pay 70%.
BUT ALL premiums for children up to 18 should be 100% paid by the government to private insurance companies - perhaps through their schools. And university students should be spnsored through their university plan regardless of age. This will inspire kids to go to university.
Congress should make it illegal for insurance companies to cancel policies.
If someone losses their job or is homeless then the government should pick up the tab 100%.
And doctors need to be protected from law suits. Errors and corrective treatment should be addressed through additional medical treatment. If the doctor's mistake shows incompitence or neglect they should lose their license to practice. Lawyers need to get off the gravy train.
How about that?
Wednesday, September 2, 2009
Tuesday, September 1, 2009
Monday, August 31, 2009
DPJ or LDP Junior?
Congratulations to the victors!
The Japanese people have spoken and they said with one voice (they do nearly everything with one voice) out with the old and in with the new. Now, as anyone who knows Japanese politics, other than a few odd candidates here and there - and always on the bottom rungs, the majority of candidates and all party leaders are:
a: sons or grandsons of old political hacks (no daughters)
b: went to the 'right' schools
c: both
So, just like Obama liked to say, he was a new guy with a message of change, the DPJ also likes to trumpet their fresh approach. But as we all know, old connections run deep and there ain't nothin' fresh about the new guys. BUT they are a little different and someone new to blame when, next year, it all hits the fan.
Hatoyama has an almost impossible task. In America, Obama went from astounding high poll numbers at his entry to dramatic lows in record time. Why? The economy of course. It's a killer and the LDP should be thanking any gods they pray to that they lost. It is the perfect time for the young up and coming LDP lions to clean house and get themselves ready.
The DPJ has little hope to improve the economy as the dollar sinks and with it, export income. The bureaucracy is bloated but can't be trimmed because people need jobs; and the tax revenue to pay off all the good time promises is coming from - where again?
I sure hope Hatoyama practiced magic, because he is going to need it quick.
Get the popcorn!!
The Japanese people have spoken and they said with one voice (they do nearly everything with one voice) out with the old and in with the new. Now, as anyone who knows Japanese politics, other than a few odd candidates here and there - and always on the bottom rungs, the majority of candidates and all party leaders are:
a: sons or grandsons of old political hacks (no daughters)
b: went to the 'right' schools
c: both
So, just like Obama liked to say, he was a new guy with a message of change, the DPJ also likes to trumpet their fresh approach. But as we all know, old connections run deep and there ain't nothin' fresh about the new guys. BUT they are a little different and someone new to blame when, next year, it all hits the fan.
Hatoyama has an almost impossible task. In America, Obama went from astounding high poll numbers at his entry to dramatic lows in record time. Why? The economy of course. It's a killer and the LDP should be thanking any gods they pray to that they lost. It is the perfect time for the young up and coming LDP lions to clean house and get themselves ready.
The DPJ has little hope to improve the economy as the dollar sinks and with it, export income. The bureaucracy is bloated but can't be trimmed because people need jobs; and the tax revenue to pay off all the good time promises is coming from - where again?
I sure hope Hatoyama practiced magic, because he is going to need it quick.
Get the popcorn!!
Friday, August 28, 2009
Senator Kennedy Goes the Way of All Things
The end of the Kennedy Era has come. Some are crying and some are cheering; but all do recognize that this family has had a powerful influence on American politics. The quinticental Robber Baron, Machiavellian Princely family. Starting from an overload patriarch liquor runner and Nazi supporter (the inconvenient truth) with four sons. This family had a plan and even though the first son died in WWII the plan never faultered - only the sons.
John got lucky. In fact, Nixon supporters might argue that luck had nothing to do with it - it was the Chicago machine that put him over the top.
The third son, it seems, was a fluke. He actually cared about the people. But alas, he was a victim of history.
And then there was Teddy. The forgotten. Cheating his way through Harvard, given a second chance with daddy's money and connections; booze, women and sex (with the unfortunate indescretion) followd on. Granted, it didn't help his emotional stability to have three older brothers killed and then the mantle of fame and the responsibility to raise all the children tossed on his shoulders.
Did he manage it well? In some cases. In the Senate he did make a name for himself and seemed to have achieved some success, though one has to wonder was it what he did or just that he was there for sooo looong. In the big picture however, he could not live up to the dream. Certainly Chappaquiddick put the nail in the coffin of what many thought was a no lose opportunity for him to be President. this little indiscretion gave us Carter. Thank you senator!
On the whole, his life was a sad tale of waste and disappointment accompanied by throngs of rock star hangers-on longing for a lost dream. Perhaps a different generation of Kennedys but I doubt it. Caroline seems to be the only one with character and she doesn't seem like a "Rose" style matriarch.
Say good-bye to Teddy and the dream that never was and likely never will be.
Too bad his legacy may end up being his name on a health care bill future generations will curse as being a horcrux around the necks of the overtaxed and underserved masses.
John got lucky. In fact, Nixon supporters might argue that luck had nothing to do with it - it was the Chicago machine that put him over the top.
The third son, it seems, was a fluke. He actually cared about the people. But alas, he was a victim of history.
And then there was Teddy. The forgotten. Cheating his way through Harvard, given a second chance with daddy's money and connections; booze, women and sex (with the unfortunate indescretion) followd on. Granted, it didn't help his emotional stability to have three older brothers killed and then the mantle of fame and the responsibility to raise all the children tossed on his shoulders.
Did he manage it well? In some cases. In the Senate he did make a name for himself and seemed to have achieved some success, though one has to wonder was it what he did or just that he was there for sooo looong. In the big picture however, he could not live up to the dream. Certainly Chappaquiddick put the nail in the coffin of what many thought was a no lose opportunity for him to be President. this little indiscretion gave us Carter. Thank you senator!
On the whole, his life was a sad tale of waste and disappointment accompanied by throngs of rock star hangers-on longing for a lost dream. Perhaps a different generation of Kennedys but I doubt it. Caroline seems to be the only one with character and she doesn't seem like a "Rose" style matriarch.
Say good-bye to Teddy and the dream that never was and likely never will be.
Too bad his legacy may end up being his name on a health care bill future generations will curse as being a horcrux around the necks of the overtaxed and underserved masses.
Wednesday, August 26, 2009
Elderly American Tourist Terrorized by Japanese Police!
An Elderly California man, 74, Carrying a typical Swiss Army style pocket knife, was asked by a policeman in a tourist rich Tokyo center if he had a knife when the man stepped into a police box to ask for directions. Not thinking anything of it, he said yes. They arrested him on the spot and hauled him off to jail. Why they asked this question is very strange, but the Japanese police think all foriegners are criminals and treat them as such. Some might argue that this was an unusual case of a rogue cop with little training but, infact, a myriad of testimonies signify it is not unusual police behavior.
In Japan his possession of a small pocketknife, a customary personal item, even allowed on planes by the normally nazi-esk US airport security, is illegal and caused him to be locked away for 10 nights in prison without going before a judge or seeing a lawyer; the man said it was unpleasant and disappointing. No doubt, since in Japan, even though he was a tourist, 74 years old and unable to understand Japanese (they don't speak English in jail), they treated him worse then they do the Japanese mafia. They could simply have confiscated the pocket knife. Twilight Zone, but true.
Lawyers and family members were appauled by the treatment, but according to the UN Human Rights Commission, this is not unusual treatment for tourists and foriegners. (And this is a country that wants to join the UN Security Council and wants to host thousands of tourists and atheletes for the Olympics?!? Wow. Think about it.)
In Japan, 10 days in detention with no lawyer and being harassed, in Japanese, to sign confessions, in Japanese, without explanation or counsel is problematic, though not uncommon.
So, bottom line: Japan really ISN'T the tourist friendly country you might think it is, and if you want to visit someplace, perhaps you should concider Hawaii or Taiwan instead.
In Japan his possession of a small pocketknife, a customary personal item, even allowed on planes by the normally nazi-esk US airport security, is illegal and caused him to be locked away for 10 nights in prison without going before a judge or seeing a lawyer; the man said it was unpleasant and disappointing. No doubt, since in Japan, even though he was a tourist, 74 years old and unable to understand Japanese (they don't speak English in jail), they treated him worse then they do the Japanese mafia. They could simply have confiscated the pocket knife. Twilight Zone, but true.
Lawyers and family members were appauled by the treatment, but according to the UN Human Rights Commission, this is not unusual treatment for tourists and foriegners. (And this is a country that wants to join the UN Security Council and wants to host thousands of tourists and atheletes for the Olympics?!? Wow. Think about it.)
In Japan, 10 days in detention with no lawyer and being harassed, in Japanese, to sign confessions, in Japanese, without explanation or counsel is problematic, though not uncommon.
So, bottom line: Japan really ISN'T the tourist friendly country you might think it is, and if you want to visit someplace, perhaps you should concider Hawaii or Taiwan instead.
Monday, August 17, 2009
Liberals Commit Suicide.
It could be called the dance of the lemmings. The Gallup poll shows that conservatives out number liberals in every state. 40% say they are conservative while only 21% say they are liberal.
35% say they are moderate.
Now the interesting thing about moderates in America is that they tend to be more conservative than liberal.
What does this mean in the real world? Well, as you read this post, the White House is backing off of socialized medicine as well as several liberal love childs. Over the next year, you will likely see President Obama 'reading the writing on the wall' and start courting the more moderate Blue Dogs and Republicans while at the same time we will hear the disappointed moans of dispair from his liberal 'friends'.
More importantly, for Republicans, the midterm elections will likely be a huge Christmas gift if they play their cards right and act "reasonable".
I foresee a mirror image of this congress coming as the people realize that having Obama as president is really cool - as long as the congress is safely Republican. Kind of like getting your cake and eating it too.
35% say they are moderate.
Now the interesting thing about moderates in America is that they tend to be more conservative than liberal.
What does this mean in the real world? Well, as you read this post, the White House is backing off of socialized medicine as well as several liberal love childs. Over the next year, you will likely see President Obama 'reading the writing on the wall' and start courting the more moderate Blue Dogs and Republicans while at the same time we will hear the disappointed moans of dispair from his liberal 'friends'.
More importantly, for Republicans, the midterm elections will likely be a huge Christmas gift if they play their cards right and act "reasonable".
I foresee a mirror image of this congress coming as the people realize that having Obama as president is really cool - as long as the congress is safely Republican. Kind of like getting your cake and eating it too.
Friday, August 14, 2009
Sarah Palin: Concerning the "Death Panels"
Yesterday President Obama responded to my statement that Democratic health care proposals would lead to rationed care; that the sick, the elderly, and the disabled would suffer the most under such rationing; and that under such a system these “unproductive” members of society could face the prospect of government bureaucrats determining whether they deserve health care.
The President made light of these concerns. He said:
“Let me just be specific about some things that I’ve been hearing lately that we just need to dispose of here. The rumor that’s been circulating a lot lately is this idea that somehow the House of Representatives voted for death panels that will basically pull the plug on grandma because we’ve decided that we don’t, it’s too expensive to let her live anymore....It turns out that I guess this arose out of a provision in one of the House bills that allowed Medicare to reimburse people for consultations about end-of-life care, setting up living wills, the availability of hospice, etc. So the intention of the members of Congress was to give people more information so that they could handle issues of end-of-life care when they’re ready on their own terms. It wasn’t forcing anybody to do anything.”
The provision that President Obama refers to is Section 1233 of HR 3200, entitled “Advance Care Planning Consultation.” [2] With all due respect, it’s misleading for the President to describe this section as an entirely voluntary provision that simply increases the information offered to Medicare recipients. The issue is the context in which that information is provided and the coercive effect these consultations will have in that context.
For those of you who think Sarah Palin is being paranoid or overly negative, I suggest you read the rest of this articole at:
The President made light of these concerns. He said:
“Let me just be specific about some things that I’ve been hearing lately that we just need to dispose of here. The rumor that’s been circulating a lot lately is this idea that somehow the House of Representatives voted for death panels that will basically pull the plug on grandma because we’ve decided that we don’t, it’s too expensive to let her live anymore....It turns out that I guess this arose out of a provision in one of the House bills that allowed Medicare to reimburse people for consultations about end-of-life care, setting up living wills, the availability of hospice, etc. So the intention of the members of Congress was to give people more information so that they could handle issues of end-of-life care when they’re ready on their own terms. It wasn’t forcing anybody to do anything.”
The provision that President Obama refers to is Section 1233 of HR 3200, entitled “Advance Care Planning Consultation.” [2] With all due respect, it’s misleading for the President to describe this section as an entirely voluntary provision that simply increases the information offered to Medicare recipients. The issue is the context in which that information is provided and the coercive effect these consultations will have in that context.
For those of you who think Sarah Palin is being paranoid or overly negative, I suggest you read the rest of this articole at:
Thursday, August 13, 2009
Serious Warning From US Government!
Treasury Department Issues Emergency Recall Of All U.S. Dollars
Long Live the Empire of Octavia!!
and our great leader Octavius Del Monte
Monday, August 3, 2009
Thursday, July 30, 2009
What Will the World Do When (not if) Israel Hits Iran?
This is one question that should be forefront in the foriegn policy minds of both the LDP and DPJ.
Why?
Obviously because there will be a serious dearth of oil coming out of the Middle East when the straits are closed as well as the "pirate policing" of the Japanese navy which would then be caught up in the middle of a war which would not be limited to Israel and Iran.
Will Israel strike Iran? It's probably an even bet. Will America support it? Of course not, ... BUT
What do YOU think?
Why?
Obviously because there will be a serious dearth of oil coming out of the Middle East when the straits are closed as well as the "pirate policing" of the Japanese navy which would then be caught up in the middle of a war which would not be limited to Israel and Iran.
Will Israel strike Iran? It's probably an even bet. Will America support it? Of course not, ... BUT
What do YOU think?
Thursday, July 23, 2009
181,470 Children Abducted in Japan Each Year!?
THE CRC OF JAPAN ESTIMATES CUMULATIVE CASES OF INTERNATIONALLY ABDUCTED CHILDREN IN JAPAN TO NUMBER IN THE THOUSANDS--
The Japan Times Herald is doing a series on international abducted children (japantherald.blogspot.com) but this seems to be just the tip of the iceberg.
If the CRC (crcjapan.com) report is to be believed, it seems that child abduction is a time honored tradition in Japan.
In the JTH article of July 24, Cmdr. Paul Toland, USN stated "... the State Department's Japan Desk explained to me that ... the Japan Child Abduction issue had been on Deputy Secretary Steinberg's agenda ..."
Of course it was, you just missed the double speak irony: the Japan Child Abduction (by North Korea) issue was on his schedule.
If this issue is to be solved, the foriegn victims of abduction must unite with the overwhelming number of native victims. If Japan were to recognize the foriegn victims, the native Japanese victims would scream, "what about us?" THAT would cause a natonal dilemma.
This is NOT a can of worms they want to open.
.
The Japan Times Herald is doing a series on international abducted children (japantherald.blogspot.com) but this seems to be just the tip of the iceberg.
If the CRC (crcjapan.com) report is to be believed, it seems that child abduction is a time honored tradition in Japan.
In the JTH article of July 24, Cmdr. Paul Toland, USN stated "... the State Department's Japan Desk explained to me that ... the Japan Child Abduction issue had been on Deputy Secretary Steinberg's agenda ..."
Of course it was, you just missed the double speak irony: the Japan Child Abduction (by North Korea) issue was on his schedule.
If this issue is to be solved, the foriegn victims of abduction must unite with the overwhelming number of native victims. If Japan were to recognize the foriegn victims, the native Japanese victims would scream, "what about us?" THAT would cause a natonal dilemma.
This is NOT a can of worms they want to open.
.
Wednesday, July 15, 2009
Rio Tinto arrests of 'great concern'
Businesses may get the perception that when they are dealing with China they are not negotiating on normal internationally recognized commercial terms and if China doesn't like the way the negotiations are going they may be thrown in jail for endangering China's national security and economic interests.
Considering China's history, this may not be a misguided perception.
Considering China's history, this may not be a misguided perception.
Sunday, July 12, 2009
DPJ the New LDP
"DPJ to drop pledge against Indian Ocean fuel mission"
The DPJ decided to change their position against joining the world to stop pirate activity for "practical reasons"
Now, as much as I disagreed with the DPJ stand against the fuel mission, I have to wonder about this. They are changing their position for practical reasons. Not because they had a change of heart. Not because they realized that joining together was the best way to accomplish a goal. They changed for practical reasons.
This is where my basic premis regarding the DPJ seems to be confirmed. Hatoyama's boys will end up being just like the good old boys of the LDP. They will follow a path, not because they believe it is the correct way to go, but because it is expediant and practical. One grandson of a political dynasty replacing the old grandson of a political dynasty.
Make no mistake, the strips on this tiger are orange and black rather than black and orange.
.
The DPJ decided to change their position against joining the world to stop pirate activity for "practical reasons"
Now, as much as I disagreed with the DPJ stand against the fuel mission, I have to wonder about this. They are changing their position for practical reasons. Not because they had a change of heart. Not because they realized that joining together was the best way to accomplish a goal. They changed for practical reasons.
This is where my basic premis regarding the DPJ seems to be confirmed. Hatoyama's boys will end up being just like the good old boys of the LDP. They will follow a path, not because they believe it is the correct way to go, but because it is expediant and practical. One grandson of a political dynasty replacing the old grandson of a political dynasty.
Make no mistake, the strips on this tiger are orange and black rather than black and orange.
.
Thursday, July 9, 2009
Tokyo Practices for October or September or August ...
May the best candidates (if any) win:
LDP - The thieves and corrupt good old boys (and their grandchildren) we know
DPJ - Not ready for prime time wannabes who get caught practicing to be LDP
Komeitō - LDP's Sōka Gakkai bed partners
JCP - Communists with a laid back approach
Happiness - If they aren't on crack we should be
Independents - Seriously folks, this is Japan
Tokyo Life Network - Rei want a cracker? No, they are not safety. (safe in real English)
.
LDP - The thieves and corrupt good old boys (and their grandchildren) we know
DPJ - Not ready for prime time wannabes who get caught practicing to be LDP
Komeitō - LDP's Sōka Gakkai bed partners
JCP - Communists with a laid back approach
Happiness - If they aren't on crack we should be
Independents - Seriously folks, this is Japan
Tokyo Life Network - Rei want a cracker? No, they are not safety. (safe in real English)
.
Sunday, July 5, 2009
Biden: "The truth is, we ... misread the economy"
.
Really?
Is it actually possible that one man who has risen to as high a position as Mr Biden, COULD BE THAT STUPID?
The man lives so constantly with his foot in his mouth, I have to wonder if it is possible that Pres. Obama selected Biden to be VP in order to have a comic relief lightening rod around him to deflect criticism.
This week alone he ...
Gives terrorists a green light in Iraq by saying violence could drive the US out;
Seems to give Israel the go ahead to attack Iran and
THEN he tells the ABC lapdog that the administration misread the economy.
Certainly "everyone" did not misread the economy; with people like Geithner and other foaming at the mouth "throw money at the problem" money managers in charge I honestly believe they didn't misread anything. In their voodoo economic plan to solve the problem, they are rabid social engineers who are steering the economy into, if not a soviet style state managed economy, then a state beholding one where major sections of prime industry and services must lick the fingers of political leaders to survive - though not likely prosper.
It is really too bad that between the greedy, self serving, Gordon Gekko imitators and Bud Fox wannabes, Wall Street Harvard Business school relative ethics idiots like Madoff and his ilke on one side and the politicians like Dodd and Rangel and boyfriend screwing Freddy & Fanny on the other, it's an economic perfect storm for the fall of the dollar and impoverishment of America.
I wonder what Ayn Rand would say?
.
Really?
Is it actually possible that one man who has risen to as high a position as Mr Biden, COULD BE THAT STUPID?
The man lives so constantly with his foot in his mouth, I have to wonder if it is possible that Pres. Obama selected Biden to be VP in order to have a comic relief lightening rod around him to deflect criticism.
This week alone he ...
Gives terrorists a green light in Iraq by saying violence could drive the US out;
Seems to give Israel the go ahead to attack Iran and
THEN he tells the ABC lapdog that the administration misread the economy.
Certainly "everyone" did not misread the economy; with people like Geithner and other foaming at the mouth "throw money at the problem" money managers in charge I honestly believe they didn't misread anything. In their voodoo economic plan to solve the problem, they are rabid social engineers who are steering the economy into, if not a soviet style state managed economy, then a state beholding one where major sections of prime industry and services must lick the fingers of political leaders to survive - though not likely prosper.
It is really too bad that between the greedy, self serving, Gordon Gekko imitators and Bud Fox wannabes, Wall Street Harvard Business school relative ethics idiots like Madoff and his ilke on one side and the politicians like Dodd and Rangel and boyfriend screwing Freddy & Fanny on the other, it's an economic perfect storm for the fall of the dollar and impoverishment of America.
I wonder what Ayn Rand would say?
.
Saturday, July 4, 2009
Wednesday, July 1, 2009
Canada Day!
Cangrats and condolances to all my Canadian friends.
I congratulate all those who made it to a real life in civilization (USA , eh!)
And condolances to those who didn't realize what direction California was in and ended up still on the periphery, but this time in Japan.
Suck it up and find something red to hug.
.
The Carrot and Stick: Paying Kids to Learn
One man said, "we shouldn't be paying kids to do
what they are supposed to do." And a professional
educator commented that instead of dangling goodies
we should show respect to the students. The next time
that professional is up for a raise, I think we
should give him lots of respect - and no goodies
(money)
If kids shouldn't be paid to do what their supposed
to do, I wonder how many kids would not get
allowances for doing the chores they are supposed to
do.
We finally have a school administrator that
understands the concept that has driven society,
like forever: "Effort gets rewarded" or "You get
what you pay for."
If you want your child to succeed how do you
motivate them? Praises and gifts right? Why is this
such a novel concept? If you do well at work you get
praise and a raise, a promotion, right? Shouldn't we
expect our children - who emulate us in every way
since birth, to value the same reward system? Good
grades are a great reward, as is praise from your boss -
but it's the money you bring home that does the trick isn't it?
The DC experiment will likely succeed big time. I am
sure it will be gradual since kids on the bottom
rung are so far behind, but I have hope that what
motivates their parents will motivate them - its the
money honey.
One problem that I see is the potential conflict
between The Teacher's Union supporting mediocre
teachers vs students who want and have the ability
to get higher grades, ergo more money. The kids will
no doubt start to complain of poor teaching skills
or lack of motivation on the part of teachers. This
will really see an upswing in the rush to get into
the best teacher's classrooms and empty classrooms for
mediocre teachers.
There are many stories of bottom rung students
suceeding through the effort and imagination of
teachers - like the Hispanic math teacher in LA who
took his students to national prominance.
There is no doubt that the kids aren't stupid - but
they are bored and seriously unmotivated by inept
and sadly lacking teachers protected by an
incompetant and corrupt union system. If the kids
are paid to learn, they will force the teachers to
teach better and this may actually decrease crime
in schools and save money.
Congratuations to Michelle Rhee!
.
what they are supposed to do." And a professional
educator commented that instead of dangling goodies
we should show respect to the students. The next time
that professional is up for a raise, I think we
should give him lots of respect - and no goodies
(money)
If kids shouldn't be paid to do what their supposed
to do, I wonder how many kids would not get
allowances for doing the chores they are supposed to
do.
We finally have a school administrator that
understands the concept that has driven society,
like forever: "Effort gets rewarded" or "You get
what you pay for."
If you want your child to succeed how do you
motivate them? Praises and gifts right? Why is this
such a novel concept? If you do well at work you get
praise and a raise, a promotion, right? Shouldn't we
expect our children - who emulate us in every way
since birth, to value the same reward system? Good
grades are a great reward, as is praise from your boss -
but it's the money you bring home that does the trick isn't it?
The DC experiment will likely succeed big time. I am
sure it will be gradual since kids on the bottom
rung are so far behind, but I have hope that what
motivates their parents will motivate them - its the
money honey.
One problem that I see is the potential conflict
between The Teacher's Union supporting mediocre
teachers vs students who want and have the ability
to get higher grades, ergo more money. The kids will
no doubt start to complain of poor teaching skills
or lack of motivation on the part of teachers. This
will really see an upswing in the rush to get into
the best teacher's classrooms and empty classrooms for
mediocre teachers.
There are many stories of bottom rung students
suceeding through the effort and imagination of
teachers - like the Hispanic math teacher in LA who
took his students to national prominance.
There is no doubt that the kids aren't stupid - but
they are bored and seriously unmotivated by inept
and sadly lacking teachers protected by an
incompetant and corrupt union system. If the kids
are paid to learn, they will force the teachers to
teach better and this may actually decrease crime
in schools and save money.
Congratuations to Michelle Rhee!
.
Wednesday, June 3, 2009
American Comedian Draws Laughs at Peking University
US Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner responded to a question put to him by his audience at Peking University by saying that "Chinese assets are very safe", drawing loud laughter from his student audience.
Because Geithner speaks Mandarin his host was unable to excuse the laughter as anything other than the students acknowledging him the court jester that he is.
Too bad his American audience isn't quite as astute.
The Peoples' Repossession
.
Because Geithner speaks Mandarin his host was unable to excuse the laughter as anything other than the students acknowledging him the court jester that he is.
Too bad his American audience isn't quite as astute.
The Peoples' Repossession
.
Saturday, May 30, 2009
Ok, Now for Somethin' Real!
.
Sorry, but I can only take so much 'herbivore' Euro-trash.
Here's some REAL music
.
Monday, May 18, 2009
For Those Who I Probably Offended
.
Sorry to have offended a certain group of people on another blog. I, however, DO standby my comment and term. So, here is a pacifier you will likely enjoy: The 2009 Eurovision winner. A catchy little piece that shows I do have a somewhat open mind:
Sorry to have offended a certain group of people on another blog. I, however, DO standby my comment and term. So, here is a pacifier you will likely enjoy: The 2009 Eurovision winner. A catchy little piece that shows I do have a somewhat open mind:
No, it wasn't a comment about J-Pop, though this song does sound oddly similar.
You don't suppose this guy is one of Rob Lowe's kids/cousins?
Saturday, May 16, 2009
"I Understand"
The meaning of the phrase "I understand"
When your Japanese counterpart says, "I understand." he/she/it is probably telling you:
1. I grasp the concept and follow your train of thought. (-1%)
2. I understand the dictionary meaning of each word. (-5%)
3. If I ask a question you will think I'm a total idiot; let's move on so I can get a drink. (95%)
Choose which of the above is most appropriate to your situation.
Personally, when I use the phrase: "I understand" (interchangable with: "I see" & "interesting"), I usually mean:
1. I know what you're saying and I think you're nuts. (20%)
2. I know what you're saying and I couldn't care less. (30%)
3. I need a drink no matter what you are saying. (50%)
Thank you Salaryman for the idea.
.
When your Japanese counterpart says, "I understand." he/she/it is probably telling you:
1. I grasp the concept and follow your train of thought. (-1%)
2. I understand the dictionary meaning of each word. (-5%)
3. If I ask a question you will think I'm a total idiot; let's move on so I can get a drink. (95%)
Choose which of the above is most appropriate to your situation.
Personally, when I use the phrase: "I understand" (interchangable with: "I see" & "interesting"), I usually mean:
1. I know what you're saying and I think you're nuts. (20%)
2. I know what you're saying and I couldn't care less. (30%)
3. I need a drink no matter what you are saying. (50%)
Thank you Salaryman for the idea.
.
Wednesday, May 13, 2009
Obama "image" vs the Obama administration
Did you watch/notice the White House briefing the other day? Cell phones going off? That is the news media "dissing" the administration. BIG TIME!
Something tells me the honeymoon is over and even though everyone might very well love the IMAGE of Obama in the White House - enough to elect him for two terms - the democrats themselves had better be very careful.
When even your ardent supporters are ignoring you on live TV you had better get the hint because, THAT AIN'T NO HINT!
.
.
Something tells me the honeymoon is over and even though everyone might very well love the IMAGE of Obama in the White House - enough to elect him for two terms - the democrats themselves had better be very careful.
When even your ardent supporters are ignoring you on live TV you had better get the hint because, THAT AIN'T NO HINT!
.
.
Monday, May 11, 2009
Tasteless Jokes?
Here is what David Feherty wrote in a Dallas magazine recently:
"If you gave any U.S. soldier a gun with two bullets in it, and he found himself in an elevator with Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and Osama Bin Laden, there's a good chance that Nancy Pelosi would get shot twice, and Harry Reid and Bin Laden would be strangled to death."
Some people (in the liberal media) don't think it's funny; personally I think its not only funny, but very likely true!
This “joke” is being compared to “tasteless” Wanda Sykes jokes about Rush Limbaugh at the Press Banquet in Washington DC:
"Rush Limbaugh hopes the country fails? I hope his kidneys fail, how 'bout that?"
Ha Ha Ha, only I would have said:
"Nancy Polosi hopes the Republicans fail? I hope her kidneys fail, how 'bout that?"
Or how about when Sykes said:
"You know, you might want to look into this, [President Obama], because I think maybe Rush Limbaugh was the 20th hijacker, but he was just so strung out on OxyContin he missed his flight. ...
I would have said:
"You know, you might want to look into this, [President Obama], because I think maybe Nancy Peloski was the 20th hijacker, but she was just holding out for a private plane so she missed her flight. ...
Tasteless? Perhaps a bitter taste, but ... I think the jokes were funny at the Press banquet AND everywhere else. After all political humor isn't really funny unless there is a ring of truth in it and perhaps a bitter taste, don't you think?
How about: The way things are going in Japan, you would think the PM just sits around on his Aso all day reading manga (comic books).
.
"If you gave any U.S. soldier a gun with two bullets in it, and he found himself in an elevator with Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and Osama Bin Laden, there's a good chance that Nancy Pelosi would get shot twice, and Harry Reid and Bin Laden would be strangled to death."
Some people (in the liberal media) don't think it's funny; personally I think its not only funny, but very likely true!
This “joke” is being compared to “tasteless” Wanda Sykes jokes about Rush Limbaugh at the Press Banquet in Washington DC:
"Rush Limbaugh hopes the country fails? I hope his kidneys fail, how 'bout that?"
Ha Ha Ha, only I would have said:
"Nancy Polosi hopes the Republicans fail? I hope her kidneys fail, how 'bout that?"
Or how about when Sykes said:
"You know, you might want to look into this, [President Obama], because I think maybe Rush Limbaugh was the 20th hijacker, but he was just so strung out on OxyContin he missed his flight. ...
I would have said:
"You know, you might want to look into this, [President Obama], because I think maybe Nancy Peloski was the 20th hijacker, but she was just holding out for a private plane so she missed her flight. ...
Tasteless? Perhaps a bitter taste, but ... I think the jokes were funny at the Press banquet AND everywhere else. After all political humor isn't really funny unless there is a ring of truth in it and perhaps a bitter taste, don't you think?
How about: The way things are going in Japan, you would think the PM just sits around on his Aso all day reading manga (comic books).
.
Sunday, May 10, 2009
Friday, May 8, 2009
The Five Thousand Year Leap
The following principles upon which the United States was founded are explored in a book: The Five Thousand Year Leap by W Cleon Skousen:
Here is a summary:
Principle 1 - The only reliable basis for sound government and just human relations is Natural Law.
Natural law is God's law. There are certain laws which govern the entire universe, and just as Thomas Jefferson said in the Declaration of Independence, there are laws which govern in the affairs of men which are "the laws of nature and of nature's God."
“If you pursue good with labor, the labor passes away but the good remains; if you pursue evil with pleasure, the pleasure passes away and the evil remains.” Cicero
Legislation in violation of natural law is a scourge to humanity. A warning to legislators who undertake to pass laws that violate the laws of nature: “...but the most foolish notion of all is the belief that everything is just which is found in the customs or laws of nations...”Cicero
Principle 2 - A free people cannot survive under a republican constitution unless they remain virtuous and morally strong.
"Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters." - Benjamin Franklin
Principle 3 - The most promising method of securing a virtuous people is to elect virtuous leaders.
"Neither the wisest constitution nor the wisest laws will secure the liberty and happiness of a people whose manners are universally corrupt. He therefore is the truest friend to the liberty of his country who tries most to promote its virtue, and who ... will not suffer a man to be chosen into any office of power and trust who is not a wise and virtuous man." - Samuel Adams
Principle 4 - Without religion the government of a free people cannot be maintained.
"Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports.... And let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion." - George Washington
Principle 5 - All things were created by God, therefore upon him all mankind are equally dependent, and to him they are equally responsible .
The American Founding Fathers considered the existence of the Creator as the most fundamental premise underlying all self-evident truth. They felt a person who boasted he or she was an atheist had just simply failed to apply his or her divine capacity for reason and observation.
Principle 6 - All mankind were created equal.
The Founders knew that in these three ways, all mankind are theoretically treated as:
1. Equal before God.
2. Equal before the law.
3. Equal in their rights.
Principle 7 - The proper role of government is to protect equal rights, not provide equal things.
The Founders recognized that the people cannot delegate to their government any power except that which they have the lawful right to exercise themselves.
Principle 8 - Mankind are endowed by God with certain unalienable rights.
"Those rights, then, which God and nature have established, and are therefore called natural rights, such as are life and liberty, need not the aid of human laws to be more effectually invested in every man than they are; neither do they receive any additional strength when declared by the municipal [or state] laws to be inviolable. On the contrary, no human legislation has power to abridge or destroy them, unless the owner [of the right] shall himself commit some act that amounts to a forfeiture." - William Blackstone
Principle 9 - To protect human rights, God has revealed a code of divine law.
"The doctrines thus delivered we call the revealed or divine law, and they are to be found only in the Holy Scriptures. These precepts, when revealed, are found by comparison to be really a part of the original law of nature, as they tend in all their consequences to man's felicity." - William Blackstone
Principle 10 - The God-given right to govern is vested in the sovereign authority of the whole people.
"The fabric of American empire ought to rest on the solid basis of the consent of the people. The streams of national power ought to flow immediately from that pure, original fountain of all legislative authority." - Alexander Hamilton
Principle 11 - The majority of the people may alter or abolish a government which has become tyrannical.
"Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes ... but when a long train of abuses and usurpations ... evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security." - Thomas Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence
Principle 12 - The United States of America shall be a republic.
"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America
And to the republic for which it stands...."
Principle 13 - A Constitution should protect the people from the frailties of their rulers.
"If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary.... [But lacking these] you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself." - James Madison
Principle 14 - Life and liberty are secure only so long as the rights of property are secure .
John Locke reasoned that God gave the earth and everything in it to the whole human family as a gift. Therefore the land, the sea, the acorns in the forest, the deer feeding in the meadow belong to everyone "in common." However, the moment someone takes the trouble to change something from its original state of nature, that person has added his ingenuity or labor to make that change. Herein lies the secret to the origin of "property rights."
Principle 15 - The highest level of prosperity occurs when there is a free-market economy and a minimum of government regulations.
Prosperity depends upon a climate of wholesome stimulation with four basic freedoms in operation:
1. The Freedom to try.
2. The Freedom to buy.
3. The Freedom to sell.
4. The Freedom to fail.
Principle 16 - The government should be separated into three branches .
"I call you to witness that I was the first member of the Congress who ventured to come out in public, as I did in January 1776, in my Thoughts on Government ... in favor of a government with three branches and an independent judiciary. This pamphlet, you know, was very unpopular. No man appeared in public to support it but yourself." - John Adams
Principle 17 - A system of checks and balances should be adopted to prevent the abuse of power by the different branches of government.
"It will not be denied that power is of an encroaching nature and that it ought to be effectually restrained from passing the limits assigned to it." - James Madison
Principle 18 - The unalienable rights of the people are most likely to be preserved if the principles of government are set forth in a written Constitution.
The structure of the American system is set forth in the Constitution of the United States and the only weaknesses which have appeared are those which were allowed to creep in despite the Constitution.
Principle 19 - Only limited and carefully defined powers should be delegated to government, all others being retained by the people.
The Tenth Amendment is the most widely violated provision of the bill of rights. If it had been respected and enforced America would be an amazingly different country than it is today. This amendment provides:
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
Principle 20 - Efficiency and dispatch require that the government operate according to the will of the majority, but constitutional provisions must be made to protect the rights of the minority.
"Every man, by consenting with others to make one body politic under one government, puts himself under an obligation to every one of that society to submit to the determination of the majority, and to be concluded [bound] by it." - John Locke
Principle 21 - Strong local self-government is the keystone to preserving human freedom.
"The way to have good and safe government is not to trust it all to one, but to divide it among the many, distributing to every one exactly the functions he is competent [to perform best]. - Thomas Jefferson
Principle 22 - A free people should be governed by law and not by the whims of men.
"The end of law is not to abolish or restrain, but to preserve and enlarge freedom. For in all the states of created beings, capable of laws, where there is no law there is no freedom. For liberty is to be free from restraint and violence of others, which cannot be where there is no law." - John Locke
Principle 23 - A free society cannot survive as a republic without a broad program of general education.
"They made an early provision by law that every town consisting of so many families should be always furnished with a grammar school. They made it a crime for such a town to be destitute of a grammar schoolmaster for a few months, and subjected it to a heavy penalty. So that the education of all ranks of people was made the care and expense of the public, in a manner that I believe has been unknown to any other people, ancient or modern. The consequences of these establishments we see and feel every day [written in 1765]. A native of America who cannot read and write is as rare ... as a comet or an earthquake." John Adams
Principle 24 - A free people will not survive unless they stay strong.
"To be prepared for war is one of the most effectual means of preserving peace." - George Washington
Principle 25 - "Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations -- entangling alliances with none."- Thomas Jefferson, given in his first inaugural address.
Principle 26 - The core unit which determines the strength of any society is the family; therefore the government should foster and protect its integrity.
"There is certainly no country in the world where the tie of marriage is more respected than in America, or where conjugal happiness is more highly or worthily appreciated." Alexis de Tocqueville
Principle 27 - The burden of debt is as destructive to human freedom as subjugation by conquest.
"We are bound to defray expenses [of the war] within our own time, and are unauthorized to burden posterity with them.... We shall all consider ourselves morally bound to pay them ourselves and consequently within the life [expectancy] of the majority." - Thomas Jefferson
Principle 28 - The United States has a manifest destiny to eventually become a glorious example of God's law under a restored Constitution that will inspire the entire human race.
The Founders sensed from the very beginning that they were on a divine mission. Their great disappointment was that it didn't all come to pass in their day, but they knew that someday it would. John Adams wrote:
"I always consider the settlement of America with reverence and wonder, as the opening of a grand scene and design in Providence for the illumination of the ignorant, and the emancipation of the slavish part of mankind all over the earth."
Thanks leatherneckm31
.
Here is a summary:
Principle 1 - The only reliable basis for sound government and just human relations is Natural Law.
Natural law is God's law. There are certain laws which govern the entire universe, and just as Thomas Jefferson said in the Declaration of Independence, there are laws which govern in the affairs of men which are "the laws of nature and of nature's God."
“If you pursue good with labor, the labor passes away but the good remains; if you pursue evil with pleasure, the pleasure passes away and the evil remains.” Cicero
Legislation in violation of natural law is a scourge to humanity. A warning to legislators who undertake to pass laws that violate the laws of nature: “...but the most foolish notion of all is the belief that everything is just which is found in the customs or laws of nations...”Cicero
Principle 2 - A free people cannot survive under a republican constitution unless they remain virtuous and morally strong.
"Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters." - Benjamin Franklin
Principle 3 - The most promising method of securing a virtuous people is to elect virtuous leaders.
"Neither the wisest constitution nor the wisest laws will secure the liberty and happiness of a people whose manners are universally corrupt. He therefore is the truest friend to the liberty of his country who tries most to promote its virtue, and who ... will not suffer a man to be chosen into any office of power and trust who is not a wise and virtuous man." - Samuel Adams
Principle 4 - Without religion the government of a free people cannot be maintained.
"Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports.... And let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion." - George Washington
Principle 5 - All things were created by God, therefore upon him all mankind are equally dependent, and to him they are equally responsible .
The American Founding Fathers considered the existence of the Creator as the most fundamental premise underlying all self-evident truth. They felt a person who boasted he or she was an atheist had just simply failed to apply his or her divine capacity for reason and observation.
Principle 6 - All mankind were created equal.
The Founders knew that in these three ways, all mankind are theoretically treated as:
1. Equal before God.
2. Equal before the law.
3. Equal in their rights.
Principle 7 - The proper role of government is to protect equal rights, not provide equal things.
The Founders recognized that the people cannot delegate to their government any power except that which they have the lawful right to exercise themselves.
Principle 8 - Mankind are endowed by God with certain unalienable rights.
"Those rights, then, which God and nature have established, and are therefore called natural rights, such as are life and liberty, need not the aid of human laws to be more effectually invested in every man than they are; neither do they receive any additional strength when declared by the municipal [or state] laws to be inviolable. On the contrary, no human legislation has power to abridge or destroy them, unless the owner [of the right] shall himself commit some act that amounts to a forfeiture." - William Blackstone
Principle 9 - To protect human rights, God has revealed a code of divine law.
"The doctrines thus delivered we call the revealed or divine law, and they are to be found only in the Holy Scriptures. These precepts, when revealed, are found by comparison to be really a part of the original law of nature, as they tend in all their consequences to man's felicity." - William Blackstone
Principle 10 - The God-given right to govern is vested in the sovereign authority of the whole people.
"The fabric of American empire ought to rest on the solid basis of the consent of the people. The streams of national power ought to flow immediately from that pure, original fountain of all legislative authority." - Alexander Hamilton
Principle 11 - The majority of the people may alter or abolish a government which has become tyrannical.
"Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes ... but when a long train of abuses and usurpations ... evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security." - Thomas Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence
Principle 12 - The United States of America shall be a republic.
"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America
And to the republic for which it stands...."
Principle 13 - A Constitution should protect the people from the frailties of their rulers.
"If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary.... [But lacking these] you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself." - James Madison
Principle 14 - Life and liberty are secure only so long as the rights of property are secure .
John Locke reasoned that God gave the earth and everything in it to the whole human family as a gift. Therefore the land, the sea, the acorns in the forest, the deer feeding in the meadow belong to everyone "in common." However, the moment someone takes the trouble to change something from its original state of nature, that person has added his ingenuity or labor to make that change. Herein lies the secret to the origin of "property rights."
Principle 15 - The highest level of prosperity occurs when there is a free-market economy and a minimum of government regulations.
Prosperity depends upon a climate of wholesome stimulation with four basic freedoms in operation:
1. The Freedom to try.
2. The Freedom to buy.
3. The Freedom to sell.
4. The Freedom to fail.
Principle 16 - The government should be separated into three branches .
"I call you to witness that I was the first member of the Congress who ventured to come out in public, as I did in January 1776, in my Thoughts on Government ... in favor of a government with three branches and an independent judiciary. This pamphlet, you know, was very unpopular. No man appeared in public to support it but yourself." - John Adams
Principle 17 - A system of checks and balances should be adopted to prevent the abuse of power by the different branches of government.
"It will not be denied that power is of an encroaching nature and that it ought to be effectually restrained from passing the limits assigned to it." - James Madison
Principle 18 - The unalienable rights of the people are most likely to be preserved if the principles of government are set forth in a written Constitution.
The structure of the American system is set forth in the Constitution of the United States and the only weaknesses which have appeared are those which were allowed to creep in despite the Constitution.
Principle 19 - Only limited and carefully defined powers should be delegated to government, all others being retained by the people.
The Tenth Amendment is the most widely violated provision of the bill of rights. If it had been respected and enforced America would be an amazingly different country than it is today. This amendment provides:
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
Principle 20 - Efficiency and dispatch require that the government operate according to the will of the majority, but constitutional provisions must be made to protect the rights of the minority.
"Every man, by consenting with others to make one body politic under one government, puts himself under an obligation to every one of that society to submit to the determination of the majority, and to be concluded [bound] by it." - John Locke
Principle 21 - Strong local self-government is the keystone to preserving human freedom.
"The way to have good and safe government is not to trust it all to one, but to divide it among the many, distributing to every one exactly the functions he is competent [to perform best]. - Thomas Jefferson
Principle 22 - A free people should be governed by law and not by the whims of men.
"The end of law is not to abolish or restrain, but to preserve and enlarge freedom. For in all the states of created beings, capable of laws, where there is no law there is no freedom. For liberty is to be free from restraint and violence of others, which cannot be where there is no law." - John Locke
Principle 23 - A free society cannot survive as a republic without a broad program of general education.
"They made an early provision by law that every town consisting of so many families should be always furnished with a grammar school. They made it a crime for such a town to be destitute of a grammar schoolmaster for a few months, and subjected it to a heavy penalty. So that the education of all ranks of people was made the care and expense of the public, in a manner that I believe has been unknown to any other people, ancient or modern. The consequences of these establishments we see and feel every day [written in 1765]. A native of America who cannot read and write is as rare ... as a comet or an earthquake." John Adams
Principle 24 - A free people will not survive unless they stay strong.
"To be prepared for war is one of the most effectual means of preserving peace." - George Washington
Principle 25 - "Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations -- entangling alliances with none."- Thomas Jefferson, given in his first inaugural address.
Principle 26 - The core unit which determines the strength of any society is the family; therefore the government should foster and protect its integrity.
"There is certainly no country in the world where the tie of marriage is more respected than in America, or where conjugal happiness is more highly or worthily appreciated." Alexis de Tocqueville
Principle 27 - The burden of debt is as destructive to human freedom as subjugation by conquest.
"We are bound to defray expenses [of the war] within our own time, and are unauthorized to burden posterity with them.... We shall all consider ourselves morally bound to pay them ourselves and consequently within the life [expectancy] of the majority." - Thomas Jefferson
Principle 28 - The United States has a manifest destiny to eventually become a glorious example of God's law under a restored Constitution that will inspire the entire human race.
The Founders sensed from the very beginning that they were on a divine mission. Their great disappointment was that it didn't all come to pass in their day, but they knew that someday it would. John Adams wrote:
"I always consider the settlement of America with reverence and wonder, as the opening of a grand scene and design in Providence for the illumination of the ignorant, and the emancipation of the slavish part of mankind all over the earth."
Thanks leatherneckm31
.
Thursday, April 30, 2009
Chrysler Bankrupt ...
The UAW owns 55%. So, when they come up for contract renewal, who are they going to negoiate with? Themselves? What a joke.
And when Obama says bankruptcy doesn't mean the company is weak, what planet does he REALLY come from?
I doubt that Fiat and Chrysler togather could do more than continue the rolling death parade of pitifully managed suckers off Obama's federal tit.
.
And when Obama says bankruptcy doesn't mean the company is weak, what planet does he REALLY come from?
I doubt that Fiat and Chrysler togather could do more than continue the rolling death parade of pitifully managed suckers off Obama's federal tit.
.
Monday, April 27, 2009
EU Warns Against Travel to USA
LUXEMBOURG - The European Union's health commissioner urged Europeans on Monday to postpone nonessential travel to the United States or Mexico due to swine flu.
She told reporters "they should avoid traveling to Mexico or the United States of America unless it is very urgent for them." (AP)
As one can only image that Japan will quickly fall into lockstep, I feel sorry for the folks in Hawaii who will likely see lots of empty rooms this season.
.
She told reporters "they should avoid traveling to Mexico or the United States of America unless it is very urgent for them." (AP)
As one can only image that Japan will quickly fall into lockstep, I feel sorry for the folks in Hawaii who will likely see lots of empty rooms this season.
.
Monday, April 6, 2009
World War III (aka The 2013 People's Action to Recover Stolen Assets)
(The story is just an outline and draft. It has not been researched for details as yet, thus organizations and legal terms are not as they should be.)
Part I:
This story begins on March 31st, 2012 with the announcement that the US government will miss the next payment on its debt for the first time in 100 years bringing stories of immanent financial collapse and bankruptcy. The Treasury sharply scolded its critics for fear mongering.
1st of April 2013: April Fool's Day in America, many thought the Bank of China was on a fool's quest when it went before the World Court today to seek redress. It asked the Court to declare the US in involuntary bankruptcy and to allow the Bank to begin foreclosure proceedings.
Yesterday, the US Treasury missed its third payment on foreign debt and it was warning domestic bond holders that payment on all government bonds would be delayed "for the foreseeable future".
At the same time, with China holding nearly all America's foreign federal debt - through its corporations it also holds a good chunk of US domestic bonds. You will recall that the Bank of China bought all the US debt held by a seriously economically depressed Japan at an excellent rate. Many say a "charity" gift to keep the Japanese from slipping into abject poverty - caused ironically enough by the firm grip Chinese manufacturers have on the American market. It seemed like a terrible investment to most at the time and recent news merely confirms it.
"China bought and paid for the 'SS America' and is going down with it!" declared the Times. Most news reporters and financial analysts scoffed and accused the Chinese of grandstanding and gloating as even if the US went belly up there was very little that could be done by any country and with China holding the bag, it would be the one to suffer by far the most. The Times reporter asked the Bank attorney, "what are you going to do, put a 'auction' sign on the White House?"
The Treasury chided the Bank of China and in a statement saying that due to the Chinese hold on the American market it would always make a profit, so it should just write off the debt and start with a fresh slate.
When asked about this in Beijing, the Bank spokesman made clear that the Bank bought and held securities based on trust and that if the US took such a cavalier attitude toward debt, why didn't if forgive African and Latin American debt so easily?
1st of June 2013: Attorneys for the Bank of China made their final argument before the Court and asked the Court to rule giving the Bank authority to foreclose and seize assets.
The US did not represent itself in front of the Court and refused to recognize the authority of the Court in internal domestic matters. The Court announced that it would rule in seven to ten days.
On the 3rd of June, at a meeting of the General Assembly in New York, the Chinese delegate brought a surprise motion before the body asking the members to support a foreclosure action against the assets held by the American government. China was seeking amicus support to bring before the Court. The vote was nearly unanimous in favor, with Great Britain and Japan abstaining. The US representative voted against the measure of course.
Immediately after winning the support of the UN, the Bank warned that it would seek arrest warrants against US government officials and detention of all those outside of the United States. This left open the possibility that all Americans traveling abroad could be held if the Court rules in the Bank's favor in the coming weeks.
The 7Th of June 2013: China is launching an ambitious 3-satellite rocket into orbit tomorrow. With its new found economic dominance after the unprecedented worldwide recession caused by American bank and stock fraud foisted upon an unsuspecting and trusting world, Chinese factories are humming once again and Chinese flagged super cargo ships are sailing to ports across the Pacific.
In business news the Chinese government announced that due to the ever increasing and overwhelming debt the US owes China, it will continue to give deep discounts to its good friends, the American people, for as long as necessary.
Even though American businesses complain that they cannot compete at what they say are artificially low prices, ever since China bought GM, nearly all autos in America as well as most modern appliances have been manufactured in China and sold at prices no consumer could resist; they also own dozens of major corporations and thousands of hectors of private property. The American congress is in no position to complain.
Also in the news there were some concerns voiced by the Pentagon that there has been an unprecedented amount of activity around the coast of Taiwan lately by Chinese Coast Guard vessels. Taiwan TV seems to be unable to cover this event due to a cut in its main underwater transmission cables possibly due to unusual seismic disturbances. The US Geological Service doesn't think its caused by earthquakes but from something of an explosive nature, perhaps volcanic. The Chinese Coast Guard said it was checking reports and making enquiries in the area.
The evening 9th of June 2013: Peking announced that in the first stage of a repossession of assets, the successful launch of a rocket carrying three nuclear satellites intended to detonate over predetermined points above the United States. While not designed to do any real damage, as such, or cause direct casualties, they were intended to emit EM pulses which shut down all electrically charged devices. This initial police action was successful. A spokesman for the Bank of China said that this was the equivalent of marshals breaking down the door to evict squatters.
At the same time in the afternoon of the 9th of June 2013: The Governor of the Bank of China received a positive ruling and submitted foreclosure papers demanding immediate search and seizure action to the World Court in the Hague. The Chinese Bank Governor complained that the US was long in default on payments and the Bank had asked the People's Army to act as "marshal" in a foreclosure action. The Bank's Governor lamented, "We even charged them less than market value over several years to give them the opportunity to save and repay debts in a timely manner. But did they? No. You would think that as a government that expounds such high moral values to others they would cut back and be more prudent in their ways. They just spent and borrowed more and more. What can you do with people like that? You’d think they were addicts the way they stole our money and spent it. We just HAD to put a stop to it!" The Bank's Governor, who came in person to receive the ruling, justified the 5:00AM (Washington time) raid that cut the lights and public services to its American properties.
He was expecting to win the case before the Court but was pleasantly surprised that the overwhelming majority of the Court was supportive.
Later at the court, the court ordered the arrest and detention of the parties responsible for the uncontrolled waste of the world's assets through printing and spending money they did not actually have assets to cover.
American leaders and representatives were ordered to submit to World Court authorities within 24 hours and all gun carrying residents of the assets, including but not limited to, security guards, police and military were ordered to surrender the assets in their possession to the court appointed marshals at the nearest collection point to their location. For American's located in the territories of other nations or on the high seas, such nations or the nearest nation had the right to seize the assets and debtors as partial payment of arrears owed them.
Meanwhile, nuclear aircraft carrier battle groups in the Pacific were reported subdued by long range tactical missiles.
The Russian government indicated that, while taking a neutral position in the Chinese "foreclosure" action against the US for non payment of its huge arrears, it does hope the People's Republic remembers that the US is in debt to many countries and when possession is taken, an equal distribution of assets should be made. At the same time, the UN in Geneva praised the Marshal of the People's Army for his minimum use of force against innocent parties.
The 13th of June: San Francisco and San Pedro. A number of Chinese cargo ships have arrived in port off loading Chinese peace keepers and asset surveyors from the newly created "People's Ministry of External Asset Management".
The Assistant Governor of the Bank of China expressed his regret that so many innocent foreign nationals are suffering due to the shutdown of the transport and electrical services but said, "when you stay in the home of criminals who don't pay their bills, you do have to expect the lights to go off."
Russian and European reporters accompanying the foreclosure team asked the governor what will happen to the Americans. He said, that while it was unfortunate in the short term that, as criminals, they would have to work off their debt in various labor areas, in the end everyone would be much better off when the debt is paid.
The French reporter asked how long they expected the Americans to be in debt, the Governor said he wasn't really sure because, while the seized physical assets would go a long way, there was a lot of clean up to do as well as the necessary expenses of maintaining the debtors everyday life. "Perhaps a hundred or so years, we'll have to see," the Governor stated. "The estimate is about $75,000 per person of debt owed the Bank of China. This is, of course not including foreclosure and legal expenses. In addition, it is based on a 400 million population figure, but as you can see, real figures expected to work off the debt are very much smaller."
The 17th of June: Representatives of the World Court and World Bank flew into Washington DC this afternoon to arrest the president and government leaders. They are charged with malfeasance and massive fraud.
There are reams of paper being seized by World Bank auditors under the supervision of marshals as evidence in the largest ponzi scheme ever imagined in the history of intergovernmental relations.
The Chinese government bitterly complained that there was no possible way the US assets seized could cover its debts. "If we had allowed this massive swindle of the world's trust to continue, how could we ever have a world market free of corruption. Americans should be put at hard labor for ten generations to cover this debt and the suffering they have caused the people of the world!" the Bank Governor exclaimed before the assembled reporters.
All holders of American passports and birth certificates were ordered arrested and held for trial as co-conspirators and accessories to the crime.
(the story continues) (My wife says I need a love story - any suggestions?)
-- (fast forward)
America on the Auction Block
The territory of the former government of the United States has been divided into 50 biddable lots. Each lot corresponds to a former state. Each territory will, henceforth, be referred to by its lot number. For example, California is now Lot 23a (northern) and Lot 23b (southern). This lot was divided due to Mexico's claim that in the foreclosure process much of its territory and citizens were damaged or inconvenienced and its application for compensation is before the Court for review. It is expected to be approved.
In addition to Mexico, Canada claimed compensation as well; being so closely neighbored to the initial police action, substantial damage was inflicted on the people and territory. In compensation, Canada was awarded Lot 1 (Alaska).
It is expected that bids will be accepted between April and December 1 of 2016. This will give interested parties time to inspect the properties. Each party should be aware that Lots are “as is”. They will be completely cleared of the former occupants prior to possession. This is the primary reason for the delay.
.
Part I:
This story begins on March 31st, 2012 with the announcement that the US government will miss the next payment on its debt for the first time in 100 years bringing stories of immanent financial collapse and bankruptcy. The Treasury sharply scolded its critics for fear mongering.
1st of April 2013: April Fool's Day in America, many thought the Bank of China was on a fool's quest when it went before the World Court today to seek redress. It asked the Court to declare the US in involuntary bankruptcy and to allow the Bank to begin foreclosure proceedings.
Yesterday, the US Treasury missed its third payment on foreign debt and it was warning domestic bond holders that payment on all government bonds would be delayed "for the foreseeable future".
At the same time, with China holding nearly all America's foreign federal debt - through its corporations it also holds a good chunk of US domestic bonds. You will recall that the Bank of China bought all the US debt held by a seriously economically depressed Japan at an excellent rate. Many say a "charity" gift to keep the Japanese from slipping into abject poverty - caused ironically enough by the firm grip Chinese manufacturers have on the American market. It seemed like a terrible investment to most at the time and recent news merely confirms it.
"China bought and paid for the 'SS America' and is going down with it!" declared the Times. Most news reporters and financial analysts scoffed and accused the Chinese of grandstanding and gloating as even if the US went belly up there was very little that could be done by any country and with China holding the bag, it would be the one to suffer by far the most. The Times reporter asked the Bank attorney, "what are you going to do, put a 'auction' sign on the White House?"
The Treasury chided the Bank of China and in a statement saying that due to the Chinese hold on the American market it would always make a profit, so it should just write off the debt and start with a fresh slate.
When asked about this in Beijing, the Bank spokesman made clear that the Bank bought and held securities based on trust and that if the US took such a cavalier attitude toward debt, why didn't if forgive African and Latin American debt so easily?
1st of June 2013: Attorneys for the Bank of China made their final argument before the Court and asked the Court to rule giving the Bank authority to foreclose and seize assets.
The US did not represent itself in front of the Court and refused to recognize the authority of the Court in internal domestic matters. The Court announced that it would rule in seven to ten days.
On the 3rd of June, at a meeting of the General Assembly in New York, the Chinese delegate brought a surprise motion before the body asking the members to support a foreclosure action against the assets held by the American government. China was seeking amicus support to bring before the Court. The vote was nearly unanimous in favor, with Great Britain and Japan abstaining. The US representative voted against the measure of course.
Immediately after winning the support of the UN, the Bank warned that it would seek arrest warrants against US government officials and detention of all those outside of the United States. This left open the possibility that all Americans traveling abroad could be held if the Court rules in the Bank's favor in the coming weeks.
The 7Th of June 2013: China is launching an ambitious 3-satellite rocket into orbit tomorrow. With its new found economic dominance after the unprecedented worldwide recession caused by American bank and stock fraud foisted upon an unsuspecting and trusting world, Chinese factories are humming once again and Chinese flagged super cargo ships are sailing to ports across the Pacific.
In business news the Chinese government announced that due to the ever increasing and overwhelming debt the US owes China, it will continue to give deep discounts to its good friends, the American people, for as long as necessary.
Even though American businesses complain that they cannot compete at what they say are artificially low prices, ever since China bought GM, nearly all autos in America as well as most modern appliances have been manufactured in China and sold at prices no consumer could resist; they also own dozens of major corporations and thousands of hectors of private property. The American congress is in no position to complain.
Also in the news there were some concerns voiced by the Pentagon that there has been an unprecedented amount of activity around the coast of Taiwan lately by Chinese Coast Guard vessels. Taiwan TV seems to be unable to cover this event due to a cut in its main underwater transmission cables possibly due to unusual seismic disturbances. The US Geological Service doesn't think its caused by earthquakes but from something of an explosive nature, perhaps volcanic. The Chinese Coast Guard said it was checking reports and making enquiries in the area.
The evening 9th of June 2013: Peking announced that in the first stage of a repossession of assets, the successful launch of a rocket carrying three nuclear satellites intended to detonate over predetermined points above the United States. While not designed to do any real damage, as such, or cause direct casualties, they were intended to emit EM pulses which shut down all electrically charged devices. This initial police action was successful. A spokesman for the Bank of China said that this was the equivalent of marshals breaking down the door to evict squatters.
At the same time in the afternoon of the 9th of June 2013: The Governor of the Bank of China received a positive ruling and submitted foreclosure papers demanding immediate search and seizure action to the World Court in the Hague. The Chinese Bank Governor complained that the US was long in default on payments and the Bank had asked the People's Army to act as "marshal" in a foreclosure action. The Bank's Governor lamented, "We even charged them less than market value over several years to give them the opportunity to save and repay debts in a timely manner. But did they? No. You would think that as a government that expounds such high moral values to others they would cut back and be more prudent in their ways. They just spent and borrowed more and more. What can you do with people like that? You’d think they were addicts the way they stole our money and spent it. We just HAD to put a stop to it!" The Bank's Governor, who came in person to receive the ruling, justified the 5:00AM (Washington time) raid that cut the lights and public services to its American properties.
He was expecting to win the case before the Court but was pleasantly surprised that the overwhelming majority of the Court was supportive.
Later at the court, the court ordered the arrest and detention of the parties responsible for the uncontrolled waste of the world's assets through printing and spending money they did not actually have assets to cover.
American leaders and representatives were ordered to submit to World Court authorities within 24 hours and all gun carrying residents of the assets, including but not limited to, security guards, police and military were ordered to surrender the assets in their possession to the court appointed marshals at the nearest collection point to their location. For American's located in the territories of other nations or on the high seas, such nations or the nearest nation had the right to seize the assets and debtors as partial payment of arrears owed them.
Meanwhile, nuclear aircraft carrier battle groups in the Pacific were reported subdued by long range tactical missiles.
The Russian government indicated that, while taking a neutral position in the Chinese "foreclosure" action against the US for non payment of its huge arrears, it does hope the People's Republic remembers that the US is in debt to many countries and when possession is taken, an equal distribution of assets should be made. At the same time, the UN in Geneva praised the Marshal of the People's Army for his minimum use of force against innocent parties.
The 13th of June: San Francisco and San Pedro. A number of Chinese cargo ships have arrived in port off loading Chinese peace keepers and asset surveyors from the newly created "People's Ministry of External Asset Management".
The Assistant Governor of the Bank of China expressed his regret that so many innocent foreign nationals are suffering due to the shutdown of the transport and electrical services but said, "when you stay in the home of criminals who don't pay their bills, you do have to expect the lights to go off."
Russian and European reporters accompanying the foreclosure team asked the governor what will happen to the Americans. He said, that while it was unfortunate in the short term that, as criminals, they would have to work off their debt in various labor areas, in the end everyone would be much better off when the debt is paid.
The French reporter asked how long they expected the Americans to be in debt, the Governor said he wasn't really sure because, while the seized physical assets would go a long way, there was a lot of clean up to do as well as the necessary expenses of maintaining the debtors everyday life. "Perhaps a hundred or so years, we'll have to see," the Governor stated. "The estimate is about $75,000 per person of debt owed the Bank of China. This is, of course not including foreclosure and legal expenses. In addition, it is based on a 400 million population figure, but as you can see, real figures expected to work off the debt are very much smaller."
The 17th of June: Representatives of the World Court and World Bank flew into Washington DC this afternoon to arrest the president and government leaders. They are charged with malfeasance and massive fraud.
There are reams of paper being seized by World Bank auditors under the supervision of marshals as evidence in the largest ponzi scheme ever imagined in the history of intergovernmental relations.
The Chinese government bitterly complained that there was no possible way the US assets seized could cover its debts. "If we had allowed this massive swindle of the world's trust to continue, how could we ever have a world market free of corruption. Americans should be put at hard labor for ten generations to cover this debt and the suffering they have caused the people of the world!" the Bank Governor exclaimed before the assembled reporters.
All holders of American passports and birth certificates were ordered arrested and held for trial as co-conspirators and accessories to the crime.
(the story continues) (My wife says I need a love story - any suggestions?)
-- (fast forward)
America on the Auction Block
The territory of the former government of the United States has been divided into 50 biddable lots. Each lot corresponds to a former state. Each territory will, henceforth, be referred to by its lot number. For example, California is now Lot 23a (northern) and Lot 23b (southern). This lot was divided due to Mexico's claim that in the foreclosure process much of its territory and citizens were damaged or inconvenienced and its application for compensation is before the Court for review. It is expected to be approved.
In addition to Mexico, Canada claimed compensation as well; being so closely neighbored to the initial police action, substantial damage was inflicted on the people and territory. In compensation, Canada was awarded Lot 1 (Alaska).
It is expected that bids will be accepted between April and December 1 of 2016. This will give interested parties time to inspect the properties. Each party should be aware that Lots are “as is”. They will be completely cleared of the former occupants prior to possession. This is the primary reason for the delay.
.
Saturday, March 28, 2009
Monday, March 9, 2009
Tuesday, February 24, 2009
Private English Lessons in Nagoya
If you need or want private "one to one" Business English lessons to help improve your position in today's economy, but you don't want to sign an expensive contract, this may be for you.
I teach a "one to one" lesson to those men and women in need of improving their Business English. This includes email, western business culture, vocabulary and presentation.
This is not for those looking for "fun" lessons. If you are serious about improving your language as well as practicing English business skills, continue reading.
The text used will be current newspapers, the Economist or current events. In addition, you will learn to speak on and describe your company, product, field and opinions. You will learn to speak, read and write executive style Business English.
The necessary tools for these lessons are: a digital voice recorder, a focused mind and a desire to succeed in the international arena.
Lessons are 3,500 yen for each 50 minute segment and are held in a public space in Sakae.
If you are interested you may contact me at: ucshea@hotmail.com (in English ONLY)
Places are limited
.
I teach a "one to one" lesson to those men and women in need of improving their Business English. This includes email, western business culture, vocabulary and presentation.
This is not for those looking for "fun" lessons. If you are serious about improving your language as well as practicing English business skills, continue reading.
The text used will be current newspapers, the Economist or current events. In addition, you will learn to speak on and describe your company, product, field and opinions. You will learn to speak, read and write executive style Business English.
The necessary tools for these lessons are: a digital voice recorder, a focused mind and a desire to succeed in the international arena.
Lessons are 3,500 yen for each 50 minute segment and are held in a public space in Sakae.
If you are interested you may contact me at: ucshea@hotmail.com (in English ONLY)
Places are limited
.
Friday, February 20, 2009
Start the Revolution - in Chicago??
What happened on the trading floor of the Merchantile Exchange!
Is this the shot heard "live" around the world beginning the "capitalist" revolution?
Who is John Gault?
And where is he when you need him?
I wonder, is everyone who presently makes over $500,000 a year going to "go on strike"?
Is this the shot heard "live" around the world beginning the "capitalist" revolution?
Who is John Gault?
And where is he when you need him?
I wonder, is everyone who presently makes over $500,000 a year going to "go on strike"?
Monday, February 2, 2009
A culture of casual and chronic corruption
Bill Richardson: Ethics scandal - commerce secretary- withdrawn
Nancy Killefer: Owes D.C. Unemployment tax - Chief Performance Officer - withdrawn
Sen. Thomas A. Daschle: Failure to pay IRS $146,000 - HHS Secretary - withdrawn
Tim Geithner: Failure to pay IRS $34,000 - Treasury secretary - Confirmed
Eric Holder: Highly questionable associations and "legal" get out of jail free promotions to: Michael Adler Group, Pacific Capital Group, Gary Winnick, Rich, Evans, Rosenberg, and FALN pardons - Attorney General - confirmed
Lanny Breuer: Connections to Halliburton, KBR, and Sandy Berger - appointed Director of DOJ Criminal Division
Hilda Solis: torpedoed by husband, Sam Sayyad's tax debt - Labor secretary - confirmation still possible
Nancy Killefer: Owes D.C. Unemployment tax - Chief Performance Officer - withdrawn
Sen. Thomas A. Daschle: Failure to pay IRS $146,000 - HHS Secretary - withdrawn
Tim Geithner: Failure to pay IRS $34,000 - Treasury secretary - Confirmed
Eric Holder: Highly questionable associations and "legal" get out of jail free promotions to: Michael Adler Group, Pacific Capital Group, Gary Winnick, Rich, Evans, Rosenberg, and FALN pardons - Attorney General - confirmed
Lanny Breuer: Connections to Halliburton, KBR, and Sandy Berger - appointed Director of DOJ Criminal Division
Hilda Solis: torpedoed by husband, Sam Sayyad's tax debt - Labor secretary - confirmation still possible
So Mr. "I won!" - who exactly lost?
“Why do the folks who want to raise our taxes
seem to have such a hard time paying their own?”
Doug Bandow, a blogger on AmSpec
.
.
Sunday, January 25, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)